Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The burden of hand, foot, and mouth disease among children under different vaccination scenarios in China: a dynamic modelling study.
Liu, Zhixi; Tian, Jie; Wang, Yue; Li, Yixuan; Liu-Helmersson, Jing; Mishra, Sharmistha; Wagner, Abram L; Lu, Yihan; Wang, Weibing.
Afiliación
  • Liu Z; School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
  • Tian J; School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
  • Wang Y; School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
  • Li Y; School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
  • Liu-Helmersson J; Department of Epidemiology and Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, Umeå University, 90187, Umeå, Sweden.
  • Mishra S; Department of Medicine, Institute of Medical Sciences, and Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
  • Wagner AL; Center for Urban Health Solutions, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
  • Lu Y; Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
  • Wang W; School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
BMC Infect Dis ; 21(1): 650, 2021 Jul 05.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34225650
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Hand, foot, and mouth disease (HFMD) is a common illness in young children. A monovalent vaccine has been developed in China protecting against enterovirus-71, bivalent vaccines preventing HFMD caused by two viruses are under development.

OBJECTIVE:

To predict and compare the incidence of HFMD under different vaccination scenarios in China.

METHODS:

We developed a compartmental model to capture enterovirus transmission and the natural history of HFMD in children aged 0-5, and calibrated to reported cases in the same age-group from 2015 to 2018. We compared the following vaccination scenarios different combinations of monovalent and bivalent vaccine; a program of constant vaccination to that of pulse vaccination prior to seasonal outbreaks.

RESULTS:

We estimate 1,982,819, 2,258,846, 1,948,522 and 2,398,566 cases from 2015 to 2018. Increased coverage of monovalent vaccine from 0 to 80% is predicted to decrease the cases by 797,262 (49.1%). Use of bivalent vaccine at an 80% coverage level would decrease the cases by 828,560. Use of a 2.0× pulse vaccination for the bivalent vaccine in addition to 80% coverage would reduce cases by over one million. The estimated R0 for HFMD in 2015-2018 was 1.08, 1.10, 1.35 and 1.17.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our results point to the benefit of bivalent vaccine and using a pulse vaccination in specific months over routine vaccination. Other ways to control HFMD include isolation of patients in the early stage of dissemination, more frequent hand-washing and ventilation, and better treatment options for patients.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Vacunas Virales / Vacunación / Enterovirus / Enfermedad de Boca, Mano y Pie Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Infant / Male / Newborn País/Región como asunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: BMC Infect Dis Asunto de la revista: DOENCAS TRANSMISSIVEIS Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Vacunas Virales / Vacunación / Enterovirus / Enfermedad de Boca, Mano y Pie Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Infant / Male / Newborn País/Región como asunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: BMC Infect Dis Asunto de la revista: DOENCAS TRANSMISSIVEIS Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China