Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
How the Norwegian population was affected by non-pharmaceutical interventions during the first six weeks of the COVID-19 lockdown.
Mæland, Silje; Bjørknes, Ragnhild; Lehmann, Stine; Sandal, Gro Mjeldheim; Hazell, William; Rabben, Åsgeir Kjetland; Vedaa, Øystein; Skogen, Jens Christoffer; Fadnes, Lars Thore.
Afiliación
  • Mæland S; Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of medicine, University of Bergen, Norway.
  • Bjørknes R; Research Unit for General Practice in Bergen, The Norwegian Research Centre, NORCE, Norway.
  • Lehmann S; Department of health promotion and development, Faculty of psychology, University of Bergen, Norway.
  • Sandal GM; Department of health promotion and development, Faculty of psychology, University of Bergen, Norway.
  • Hazell W; Department of Psychosocial Science, Faculty of psychology, University of Bergen, Norway.
  • Rabben ÅK; Bergen Municipality, Norway.
  • Vedaa Ø; Bergen Municipality, Norway.
  • Skogen JC; Department of Health Promotion, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Norway.
  • Fadnes LT; Department of Mental Health, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway.
Scand J Public Health ; 50(1): 94-101, 2022 Feb.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34250865
ABSTRACT

AIMS:

The aim of this study was to examine how the Norwegian general adult population was affected by non-pharmaceutical interventions during the first six weeks of the COVID-19 lockdown. We assessed quarantine, symptoms, social distancing, home office/school, work status, social contact and health-care contact through digital access and knowledge.

METHODS:

A cross-sectional survey was performed of 29,535 adults (aged 18-99) in Norway after six weeks of non-pharmaceutical interventions in March/April 2020.

RESULTS:

Most participants found the non-pharmaceutical interventions to be manageable, with 20% of all adults and 30% of those aged <30 regarding them as acceptable only to some or a limited degree. Sixteen per cent had been quarantined, 6% had experienced symptoms that could be linked to COVID-19 and 84% practiced social distancing. Eleven per cent reported changes in the use of health and social services. Three-quarters (75%) of those who had mental health or physiotherapy sessions at least monthly before the pandemic reported a reduction in their use of these services. A substantial reduction was also seen for home nursing, hospital services and dentists compared to usage before the non-pharmaceutical interventions. Immigrants were more likely to experience a reduction in follow-up from psychologists and physiotherapy. With regard to the use of general practitioners, the proportions reporting an increase and a reduction were relatively equal.

CONCLUSIONS:

The non-pharmaceutical interventions were perceived as manageable by the majority of the adult general population in Norway at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. A substantial proportion of adults <30 years old experienced difficulties with social distancing, and those >70 years old lacked the digital tools and knowledge. Further, immigrant access to health services needs monitoring and future attention.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: COVID-19 Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Humans País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Scand J Public Health Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA SOCIAL / SAUDE PUBLICA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Noruega

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: COVID-19 Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Humans País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Scand J Public Health Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA SOCIAL / SAUDE PUBLICA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Noruega