Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Use of incretin-based drugs and risk of cholangiocarcinoma: Scandinavian cohort study.
Ueda, Peter; Wintzell, Viktor; Melbye, Mads; Eliasson, Björn; Svensson, Ann-Marie; Franzén, Stefan; Gudbjörnsdottir, Soffia; Hveem, Kristian; Jonasson, Christian; Svanström, Henrik; Pasternak, Björn.
Afiliación
  • Ueda P; Clinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine, Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. peter.ueda@ki.se.
  • Wintzell V; Clinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine, Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Melbye M; Department of Epidemiology Research, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Eliasson B; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Svensson AM; Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
  • Franzén S; Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
  • Gudbjörnsdottir S; Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
  • Hveem K; The Swedish National Diabetes Register, Västra Götalandsregionen, Gothenburg, Sweden.
  • Jonasson C; The Swedish National Diabetes Register, Västra Götalandsregionen, Gothenburg, Sweden.
  • Svanström H; Health Metrics, Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
  • Pasternak B; Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Diabetologia ; 64(10): 2204-2214, 2021 10.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34254177
ABSTRACT
AIMS/

HYPOTHESIS:

Concerns have been raised regarding a potential association of use of the incretin-based drugs dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1)-receptor agonists with risk of cholangiocarcinoma. We examined this association in nationwide data from three countries.

METHODS:

We used data from nationwide registers in Sweden, Denmark and Norway, 2007-2018, to conduct two cohort studies, one for DPP4 inhibitors and one for GLP-1-receptor agonists, to investigate the risk of incident cholangiocarcinoma compared with an active-comparator drug class (sulfonylureas). The cohorts included patients initiating treatment episodes with DPP4 inhibitors vs sulfonylureas, and GLP-1-receptor agonists vs sulfonylureas. We used Cox regression models, adjusted for potential confounders, to estimate hazard ratios from day 366 after treatment initiation to account for cancer latency.

RESULTS:

The main analyses of DPP4 inhibitors included 1,414,144 person-years of follow-up from 222,577 patients receiving DPP4 inhibitors (median [IQR] follow-up time, 4.5 [2.6-7.0] years) and 123,908 patients receiving sulfonylureas (median [IQR] follow-up time, 5.1 [2.9-7.8] years) during which 350 cholangiocarcinoma events occurred. Use of DPP4 inhibitors, compared with sulfonylureas, was not associated with a statistically significant increase in risk of cholangiocarcinoma (incidence rate 26 vs 23 per 100,000 person-years; adjusted HR, 1.15 [95% CI 0.90, 1.46]; absolute rate difference 3 [95% CI -3, 10] events per 100,000 person-years). The main analyses of GLP-1-receptor agonists included 1,036,587 person-years of follow-up from 96,813 patients receiving GLP-1-receptor agonists (median [IQR] follow-up time, 4.4 [2.4-6.9] years) and 142,578 patients receiving sulfonylureas (median [IQR] follow-up time, 5.5 [3.2-8.1] years) during which 249 cholangiocarcinoma events occurred. Use of GLP-1-receptor agonists was not associated with a statistically significant increase in risk of cholangiocarcinoma (incidence rate 26 vs 23 per 100,000 person-years; adjusted HR, 1.25 [95% CI 0.89, 1.76]; absolute rate difference 3 [95% CI -5, 13] events per 100,000 patient-years). CONCLUSIONS/

INTERPRETATION:

In this analysis using nationwide data from three countries, use of DPP4 inhibitors and GLP-1-receptor agonists, compared with sulfonylureas, was not associated with a significantly increased risk of cholangiocarcinoma.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares / Colangiocarcinoma / Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 / Inhibidores de la Dipeptidil-Peptidasa IV / Incretinas / Receptor del Péptido 1 Similar al Glucagón Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Diabetologia Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Suecia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares / Colangiocarcinoma / Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 / Inhibidores de la Dipeptidil-Peptidasa IV / Incretinas / Receptor del Péptido 1 Similar al Glucagón Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Diabetologia Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Suecia