Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Sonodynamic Treatment Induces Selective Killing of Cancer Cells in an In Vitro Co-Culture Model.
Foglietta, Federica; Pinnelli, Vanessa; Giuntini, Francesca; Barbero, Nadia; Panzanelli, Patrizia; Durando, Gianni; Terreno, Enzo; Serpe, Loredana; Canaparo, Roberto.
Afiliación
  • Foglietta F; Department of Drug Science and Technology, University of Torino, 10125 Torino, Italy.
  • Pinnelli V; Department of Drug Science and Technology, University of Torino, 10125 Torino, Italy.
  • Giuntini F; School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool L3 3AF, UK.
  • Barbero N; Department of Chemistry, NIS Interdepartmental Centre and INSTM Reference Centre, University of Torino, 10125 Torino, Italy.
  • Panzanelli P; Department of Neuroscience Rita Levi Montalcini, University of Torino, 10125 Torino, Italy.
  • Durando G; National Institute of Metrological Research (INRIM), 10135 Torino, Italy.
  • Terreno E; Department of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences, University of Torino, 10126 Torino, Italy.
  • Serpe L; Department of Drug Science and Technology, University of Torino, 10125 Torino, Italy.
  • Canaparo R; Department of Drug Science and Technology, University of Torino, 10125 Torino, Italy.
Cancers (Basel) ; 13(15)2021 Jul 30.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34359753
ABSTRACT
Sonodynamic Therapy (SDT) is a new anticancer strategy based on ultrasound (US) technique and is derived from photodynamic therapy (PDT); SDT is still, however, far from clinical application. In order to move this therapy forward from bench to bedside, investigations have been focused on treatment selectivity between cancer cells and normal cells. As a result, the effects of the porphyrin activation by SDT on cancer (HT-29) and normal (HDF 106-05) cells were studied in a co-culture evaluating cell cytotoxicity, reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, mitochondrial function and plasma membrane fluidity according to the bilayer sonophore (BLS) theory. While PDT induced similar effects on both HT-29 and HDF 106-05 cells in co-culture, SDT elicited significant cytotoxicity, ROS production and mitochondrial impairment on HT-29 cells only, whereas HDF 106-05 cells were unaffected. Notably, HT-29 and HDF 106-05 showed different cell membrane fluidity during US exposure. In conclusion, our data demonstrate a marked difference between cancer cells and normal cells in co-culture in term of responsiveness to SDT, suggesting that this different behavior can be ascribed to diversity in plasma membrane properties, such as membrane fluidity, according to the BLS theory.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Cancers (Basel) Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Italia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Cancers (Basel) Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Italia