Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cost effectiveness of intermediate-risk squamous cell carcinoma treated with Mohs micrographic surgery compared with wide local excision.
Udkoff, Jeremy; Beal, Brandon T; Brodland, David G; Knackstedt, Thomas.
Afiliación
  • Udkoff J; Department of Dermatology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
  • Beal BT; Jacksonville Skin Cancer Specialists, Jacksonville, Florida; Zitelli and Brodland, PC, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Departments of Dermatology, Otolaryngology, and Plastic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
  • Brodland DG; Zitelli and Brodland, PC, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Departments of Dermatology, Otolaryngology, and Plastic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
  • Knackstedt T; Case Western Reserve University, School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio; MetroHealth System, Department of Dermatology, Cleveland, Ohio. Electronic address: Thomas.j.knackstedt@gmail.com.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 86(2): 303-311, 2022 02.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34363906
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The efficacy of Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) in treating cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma has been demonstrated. The cost effectiveness of MMS has rarely been studied to support the perceived higher cost.

OBJECTIVE:

Perform a cost-effectiveness analysis to determine whether MMS is cost effective over wide local excision (WLE) for Brigham and Women's Hospital tumor stage T2a cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma over a 5-year period.

METHODS:

A Markov model with a 5-year time horizon was created using variables from published data. Costs in United States dollars and quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) were calculated.

RESULTS:

MMS was $333.83 less expensive ($4365.57 [95% CI, $3664.68-$6901.66] vs $4699.41 [95% CI, $3782.94-$10,019.31]) than WLE. MMS gained 2.22 weeks of perfect health (3.776 QALY [95% CI, 3.774-3.777] for MMS and 3.733 QALY [95% CI, 3.728-3.777]) over 5 years. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was -$7,822.19. MMS had a 99.9% probability of being more cost effective than WLE. Annualized savings of choosing MMS over WLE would be $200 million and over 25,000 QALY. MMS could cost 3.1 times its current rate and remain cost effective.

LIMITATIONS:

Relied on data from external retrospective sources.

CONCLUSION:

MMS is less costly and more effective than WLE and should be strongly considered for stage T2a cSCC, given improvements in costs and QALY.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Cutáneas / Carcinoma de Células Escamosas / Cirugía de Mohs Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Am Acad Dermatol Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Cutáneas / Carcinoma de Células Escamosas / Cirugía de Mohs Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Am Acad Dermatol Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article