Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Report on outcomes of valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation and redo surgical aortic valve replacement in the Netherlands.
van Steenbergen, G J; van Straten, B; Lam, K Y; van Veghel, D; Dekker, L; Tonino, P A.
Afiliación
  • van Steenbergen GJ; Catharina Heart Centre, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands. gijs.v.steenbergen@catharinaziekenhuis.nl.
  • van Straten B; Catharina Heart Centre, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
  • Lam KY; Catharina Heart Centre, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
  • van Veghel D; Catharina Heart Centre, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
  • Dekker L; Netherlands Heart Registration, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Tonino PA; Catharina Heart Centre, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Neth Heart J ; 30(2): 106-112, 2022 Feb.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34373997
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

We sought to investigate real-world outcomes of patients with degenerated biological aortic valve prostheses who had undergone valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation (ViV-TAVI) or reoperative surgical aortic valve replacement (redo-SAVR) in the Netherlands.

METHODS:

Patients who had undergone ViV-TAVI or redo-SAVR for a degenerated biological aortic valve prosthesis in the Netherlands between January 2014 and December 2018 were eligible for this retrospective study. Patients with a prior homograft, active endocarditis or mechanical aortic valve prosthesis were excluded. Patients were matched using the propensity score. The primary endpoint was a composite of 30-day all-cause mortality and in-hospital postoperative stroke. Secondary endpoints were all-cause mortality at different time points, in-hospital postoperative stroke, pacemaker implantation and redo procedures within one year. Baseline characteristics and outcome data were collected from the Netherlands Heart Registration.

RESULTS:

From 16 cardiac centres, 653 patients were included in the study (374 ViV-TAVI and 279 redo-SAVR). European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation I (EuroSCORE I) was higher in ViV-TAVI patients (19.4, interquartile range (IQR) 13.3-27.9 vs 13.8, IQR 8.3-21.9, p < 0.01). After propensity score matching, 165 patients were matched with acceptable covariate balance. In the matched cohorts, the primary endpoint was not significantly different for ViV-TAVI and redo-SAVR patients (odds ratio 1.30, 95% confidence interval 0.57-3.02). Procedural, 30-day and 1­year all-cause mortality rates, incidence of in-hospital postoperative stroke, pacemaker implantation and redo procedures within one year were also similar between cohorts.

CONCLUSION:

Patients with degenerated aortic bioprostheses treated with ViV-TAVI or redo-SAVR have similar mortality and morbidity.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Neth Heart J Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Neth Heart J Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos