Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Empirical evaluation of the spatial scale and detection process of camera trap surveys.
Kays, Roland; Hody, Allison; Jachowski, David S; Parsons, Arielle W.
Afiliación
  • Kays R; Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, 2800 Faucette Drive, Raleigh, NC, USA. rwkays@ncsu.edu.
  • Hody A; North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences, 11 West Jones Street, Raleigh, NC, USA. rwkays@ncsu.edu.
  • Jachowski DS; Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, 2800 Faucette Drive, Raleigh, NC, USA.
  • Parsons AW; Department of Forestry and Environmental Conservation, Clemson University, 258 Lehotsky Hall, Clemson, SC, USA.
Mov Ecol ; 9(1): 41, 2021 Aug 14.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34391486
BACKGROUND: Camera traps present a valuable tool for monitoring animals but detect species imperfectly. Occupancy models are frequently used to address this, but it is unclear what spatial scale the data represent. Although individual cameras monitor animal activity within a small target window in front of the device, many practitioners use these data to infer animal presence over larger, vaguely-defined areas. Animal movement is generally presumed to link these scales, but fine-scale heterogeneity in animal space use could disrupt this relationship. METHODS: We deployed cameras at 10 m intervals across a 0.6 ha forest plot to create an unprecedentedly dense sensor array that allows us to compare animal detections at these two scales. Using time-stamped camera detections we reconstructed fine-scale movement paths of four mammal species and characterized (a) how well animal use of a single camera represented use of the surrounding plot, (b) how well cameras detected animals, and (c) how these processes affected overall detection probability, p. We used these observations to parameterize simulations that test the performance of occupancy models in realistic scenarios. RESULTS: We document two important aspects of animal movement and how it affects sampling with passive detectors. First, animal space use is heterogeneous at the camera-trap scale, and data from a single camera may poorly represent activity in its surroundings. Second, cameras frequently (14-71%) fail to record passing animals. Our simulations show how this heterogeneity can introduce unmodeled variation into detection probability, biasing occupancy estimates for species with low p. CONCLUSIONS: Occupancy or population estimates with camera traps could be improved by increasing camera reliability to reduce missed detections, adding covariates to model heterogeneity in p, or increasing the area sampled by each camera through different sampling designs or technologies.

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Mov Ecol Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Mov Ecol Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos