Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Adherence to Car Seat Tolerance Screening Differs by Indication and Patient Characteristics.
McLaurin-Jiang, Skyler; Weinberger, Morris; Ritter, Victor; O'Shea, T Michael; Flower, Kori B.
Afiliación
  • McLaurin-Jiang S; Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. Skyler.mclaurin@ttuhsc.edu.
  • Weinberger M; Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. Skyler.mclaurin@ttuhsc.edu.
  • Ritter V; Department of Pediatrics, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center School of Medicine, 1400 Wallace Blvd, Amarillo, TX, 79106, USA. Skyler.mclaurin@ttuhsc.edu.
  • O'Shea TM; Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
  • Flower KB; Department of Biostatics, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Matern Child Health J ; 25(11): 1707-1716, 2021 Nov.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34403071
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To assess whether adherence to institutional car seat tolerance screening (CSTS) guidelines differed for infants born preterm (PTM), term low birth weight (T-LBW), or both preterm and low birth weight (P-LBW), and to examine the association between CSTS adherence and patient characteristics. STUDY

DESIGN:

Within two large academic and community hospitals, we retrospectively reviewed all infants meeting institutional criteria (< 37 weeks' gestation and/or < 2.27 kg) for CSTS from 2014 to 2018. Multivariable logistic regression evaluated the association of patient characteristics with institutional CSTS guideline adherence.

RESULTS:

4374 eligible infants were born PTM (50.9%), T-LBW (6.5%), or P-LBW (42.6%). Adherence rates were 92.7% in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and 95.2% in the well-baby nursery with initial CSTS failure rates of 6.1% and 9.9%, respectively. Adherence was lowest among T-LBW (80.7%) compared to PTM (95.1%) or P-LBW (92.2%) infants in the NICU (p < 0.001) and well-baby nursery (81.6%, 96.7% and 97.1%, respectively, p < 0.001). In bivariate analyses, gestational age, birth weight, insurance, race, hospital type, discharge year, and preferred language were associated with adherence. In fully-adjusted models, adherence was positively associated with lower gestational age, higher birth weight, non-Medicaid insurance, and later discharge year (NICU) and lower gestational age and later discharge year (well-baby nursery).

CONCLUSIONS:

Adherence was lower for T-LBW than PTM or P-LBW infants, despite similar CSTS failure rates. Disparities in adherence among Medicaid-insured patients in the NICU warrant further study. Future studies are needed to clarify the benefit of CSTS and increase adherence in high-risk populations.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Sistemas de Retención Infantil Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Límite: Humans / Infant / Newborn Idioma: En Revista: Matern Child Health J Asunto de la revista: PERINATOLOGIA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Sistemas de Retención Infantil Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Límite: Humans / Infant / Newborn Idioma: En Revista: Matern Child Health J Asunto de la revista: PERINATOLOGIA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos