Short-term Outcomes of Robot-assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Compared With Thoracoscopic or Transthoracic Esophagectomy.
Anticancer Res
; 41(9): 4455-4462, 2021 Sep.
Article
en En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-34475069
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/AIM:
There is no study comparing open esophagectomy (OE), video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS), and robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) in a single institution. PATIENTS ANDMETHODS:
This study included 272 patients who underwent subtotal esophagectomy divided into three groups OE (n=110), VATS (n=127), and RAMIE (n=35) groups. Moreover, short-term outcomes were compared.RESULTS:
Overall complications (CD≥II) were significantly less in the RAMIE than the OE and VATS groups. Recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis (CD≥II) was significantly lower in the RAMIE than the OE group (p=0.026) and tended to be lower than that in the VATS group (p=0.059). The RAMIE group had significantly less atelectasis (CD≥I and II), pleural effusion (CD≥I and II), arrhythmia (CD≥II), and dysphagia (CD≥II), than both the OE and VATS groups.CONCLUSION:
RAMIE reduced overall postoperative complications after esophagectomy compared with both OE and VATS.Palabras clave
Texto completo:
1
Colección:
01-internacional
Banco de datos:
MEDLINE
Asunto principal:
Complicaciones Posoperatorias
/
Esofagectomía
/
Traumatismos del Nervio Laríngeo
Tipo de estudio:
Observational_studies
/
Risk_factors_studies
Límite:
Adult
/
Aged
/
Aged80
/
Female
/
Humans
/
Male
/
Middle aged
Idioma:
En
Revista:
Anticancer Res
Año:
2021
Tipo del documento:
Article
País de afiliación:
Japón