Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Feasibility of Systems Support Mapping to guide patient-driven health self-management in colorectal cancer survivors.
Sohl, Stephanie J; Befus, Deanna; Tooze, Janet A; Levine, Beverly; Golden, Shannon L; Puccinelli-Ortega, Nicole; Pasche, Boris C; Weaver, Kathryn E; Lich, Kristen Hassmiller.
Afiliación
  • Sohl SJ; Wake Forest School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
  • Befus D; Arthur Labatt Family School of Nursing, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada.
  • Tooze JA; Wake Forest School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
  • Levine B; Wake Forest School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
  • Golden SL; Wake Forest School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
  • Puccinelli-Ortega N; Wake Forest School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
  • Pasche BC; Wake Forest School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
  • Weaver KE; Wake Forest School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
  • Lich KH; Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Psychol Health ; 38(5): 602-622, 2023 05.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34570677
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate feasibility of System Support Mapping (MAP), a systems thinking activity that involves creating a diagram of existing self-management activities (e.g. symptom management, health behaviors) to facilitate autonomous engagement in optimal self-management.

DESIGN:

One-arm pilot study of MAP in colorectal cancer survivors (NCT03520283). MAIN OUTCOME

MEASURES:

Feasibility of recruitment and retention (primary outcome), acceptability, and outcome variability over time.

RESULTS:

We enrolled 24 of 66 cancer survivors approached (36%) and 20 completed follow-up (83%). Key reasons for declining participation included not interested (n = 18), did not perceive a need (n = 9), and emotional distress/overwhelmed (n = 7). Most participants reported that MAP was acceptable (e.g. 80% liked MAP quite a bit/very much). Exploratory analyses revealed a -4.68 point reduction in fatigue from before to 2 weeks after MAP exceeding a minimally important difference (d = -0.68). There were also improvements in patient autonomy (d = 0.63), self-efficacy (for managing symptoms d = 0.56, for managing chronic disease d = 0.44), psychological stress (d = -0.45), anxiety (d = -0.34), sleep disturbance (d = -0.29) and pain (d = -0.32). Qualitative feedback enhanced interpretation of results.

CONCLUSIONS:

MAP feasibility in colorectal cancer survivors was mixed, predominantly because many patients did not perceive a need for this approach. MAP was acceptable among participants and showed promise for improving health outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Colorrectales / Supervivientes de Cáncer / Automanejo Tipo de estudio: Qualitative_research Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Psychol Health Asunto de la revista: PSICOLOGIA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Colorrectales / Supervivientes de Cáncer / Automanejo Tipo de estudio: Qualitative_research Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Psychol Health Asunto de la revista: PSICOLOGIA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos