Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Freeze tolerance influenced forest cover and hydrology during the Pennsylvanian.
Matthaeus, William J; Macarewich, Sophia I; Richey, Jon D; Wilson, Jonathan P; McElwain, Jennifer C; Montañez, Isabel P; DiMichele, William A; Hren, Michael T; Poulsen, Christopher J; White, Joseph D.
Afiliación
  • Matthaeus WJ; Department of Biology, Baylor University, Waco, TX 76706; will_matthaeus@baylor.edu.
  • Macarewich SI; Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109.
  • Richey JD; Department of Biology, Baylor University, Waco, TX 76706.
  • Wilson JP; Department of Environmental Studies, Haverford College, Haverford, PA 19041.
  • McElwain JC; Botany, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland D02 PN40.
  • Montañez IP; Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA 95616.
  • DiMichele WA; Department of Paleobiology, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20560.
  • Hren MT; Department of Geosciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269.
  • Poulsen CJ; Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109.
  • White JD; Department of Biology, Baylor University, Waco, TX 76706.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ; 118(42)2021 10 19.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34635589
ABSTRACT
The distribution of forest cover alters Earth surface mass and energy exchange and is controlled by physiology, which determines plant environmental limits. Ancient plant physiology, therefore, likely affected vegetation-climate feedbacks. We combine climate modeling and ecosystem-process modeling to simulate arboreal vegetation in the late Paleozoic ice age. Using GENESIS V3 global climate model simulations, varying pCO2, pO2, and ice extent for the Pennsylvanian, and fossil-derived leaf CN, maximum stomatal conductance, and specific conductivity for several major Carboniferous plant groups, we simulated global ecosystem processes at a 2° resolution with Paleo-BGC. Based on leaf water constraints, Pangaea could have supported widespread arboreal plant growth and forest cover. However, these models do not account for the impacts of freezing on plants. According to our interpretation, freezing would have affected plants in 59% of unglaciated land during peak glacial periods and 73% during interglacials, when more high-latitude land was unglaciated. Comparing forest cover, minimum temperatures, and paleo-locations of Pennsylvanian-aged plant fossils from the Paleobiology Database supports restriction of forest extent due to freezing. Many genera were limited to unglaciated land where temperatures remained above -4 °C. Freeze-intolerance of Pennsylvanian arboreal vegetation had the potential to alter surface runoff, silicate weathering, CO2 levels, and climate forcing. As a bounding case, we assume total plant mortality at -4 °C and estimate that contracting forest cover increased net global surface runoff by up to 6.1%. Repeated freezing likely influenced freeze- and drought-tolerance evolution in lineages like the coniferophytes, which became increasingly dominant in the Permian and early Mesozoic.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Árboles Idioma: En Revista: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Árboles Idioma: En Revista: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article