Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Can perioperative psychological interventions decrease the risk of postsurgical pain and disability? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Nadinda, Putu G; van Ryckeghem, Dimitri M L; Peters, Madelon L.
Afiliación
  • Nadinda PG; Department of Clinical Psychological Science, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
  • van Ryckeghem DML; Department of Health, Medical, and Neuropsychology, Faculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands.
  • Peters ML; Department of Clinical Psychological Science, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Pain ; 163(7): 1254-1273, 2022 07 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34711760
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT Many patients experience pain after surgery. Psychological factors such as emotion and cognition are shown to be associated with the development of acute and chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP). Therefore, the question arises whether targeting these psychological factors can reduce negative postsurgical outcomes. The aim of the current review was to investigate the efficacy of perioperative psychological interventions in reducing (sub)acute postsurgical pain and CPSP and disability in adults. Randomized controlled trials were identified through 4 databases (Web of Science, PsychINFO, PubMed, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature [CINAHL]). The outcomes of interest were (sub)acute (ie, within 3 months after surgery) and chronic (>3 months after surgery) pain and disability. After screening, 21 studies were included in the final analyses. It was found that psychological interventions significantly reduced (sub)acute pain (d = -0.26, 95% confidence interval [CI] [-0.48 to -0.04]) and disability (d = -0.43, 95% CI [-0.84 to -0.03]) as well as CPSP (d = -0.33, 95% CI [-0.61 to -0.06]) and disability (d = -0.43, 95% CI [-0.68 to -0.18]). In addition, interventions delivered after surgery and interventions delivered by a psychologist tended to be more effective than interventions delivered before surgery and interventions delivered by another healthcare provider. Furthermore, the current review points to the need for more research to determine which specific type of intervention may be most beneficial for surgical patients. Finally, the current review identified that research in this domain has concerns regarding bias in missing outcome data due to withdrawal and drop out.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Personas con Discapacidad / Intervención Psicosocial Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Pain Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Personas con Discapacidad / Intervención Psicosocial Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Pain Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos