Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Sex Education Practices for People With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities: A Qualitative Study.
Schmidt, Elizabeth K; Hand, Brittany N; Havercamp, Susan; Sommerich, Carolyn; Weaver, Lindy; Darragh, Amy.
Afiliación
  • Schmidt EK; Elizabeth K. Schmidt, PhD, OTR/L, is Postdoctoral Fellow, Families and Autism Research Laboratory, College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Sargent College, Boston University, Boston, MA; ekschmid@bu.edu.
  • Hand BN; Brittany N. Hand, PhD, OTR/L, is Assistant Professor, Department of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus.
  • Havercamp S; Susan Havercamp, PhD, is Associate Professor, Nisonger Center, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus.
  • Sommerich C; Carolyn Sommerich, PhD, is Associate Professor, Department of Integrated Systems Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus.
  • Weaver L; Lindy Weaver, PhD, OTR/L, is Assistant Professor, Injury Prevention and Rehabilitation Research Laboratory, Department of Occupational Therapy, The Ohio State University, Columbus.
  • Darragh A; Amy Darragh, PhD, OTR/L, FAOTA, is Division Director and Associate Professor, Injury Prevention and Rehabilitation Research Laboratory, Department of Occupational Therapy, The Ohio State University, Columbus.
Am J Occup Ther ; 75(3)2021 May 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34781351
ABSTRACT
IMPORTANCE People with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) express a clear interest in intimate relationships but face many barriers to receiving sex education (SE) that would support their engagement in these relationships.

OBJECTIVE:

To understand barriers to, the context of, and recommendations for SE for people with IDD.

DESIGN:

Qualitative study design with interviews and focus groups with four key stakeholder groups. Data were analyzed using a constant comparative approach.

PARTICIPANTS:

Participants were 8 youths with IDD, 9 parents, 12 health care providers, and 8 educators.

RESULTS:

Four barriers to SE were identified (1) values and cultural issues, (2) parental attitudes toward their child's sexuality, (3) a lack of organizational policies and standards, and (4) limited professional education or societal biases. These barriers contribute to a SE context primarily initiated by people with IDD or provided reactively. The participants recommended proactive, formal SE provided by multiple stakeholders throughout adulthood. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Stakeholders should advocate for policies, standards, and additional training for parents, educators, and health care providers to support SE for people with IDD throughout adulthood. What This Article Adds Barriers to SE contribute to the current context in which SE is shared with people with IDD. Stakeholders can advocate for policies, standards, and training to overcome these barriers and support recommendations for proactive, formal SE provided by multiple stakeholders through adulthood.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Discapacidades del Desarrollo / Discapacidad Intelectual Tipo de estudio: Qualitative_research Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Child / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Am J Occup Ther Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Discapacidades del Desarrollo / Discapacidad Intelectual Tipo de estudio: Qualitative_research Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Child / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Am J Occup Ther Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article