Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Randomised controlled trial of interventions for bothersome tinnitus: DesyncraTM versus cognitive behavioural therapy.
Theodoroff, Sarah M; McMillan, Garnett P; Schmidt, Caroline J; Dann, Serena M; Hauptmann, Christian; Goodworth, Marie-Christine; Leibowitz, Ruth Q; Random, Chan; Henry, James A.
Afiliación
  • Theodoroff SM; VA RR&D National Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, USA.
  • McMillan GP; Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
  • Schmidt CJ; VA RR&D National Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, USA.
  • Dann SM; Yale School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, New Haven, CT, USA.
  • Hauptmann C; VA RR&D National Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, USA.
  • Goodworth MC; Desyncra Operating GmbH, Bad Neuenahr-Ahrweiler, Germany.
  • Leibowitz RQ; Bio-Inspired Information Processing, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Engineering, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
  • Random C; Graduate School of Clinical Psychology, George Fox University, Newberg, OR, USA.
  • Henry JA; Psychologist in Private Practice, Portland, OR, USA.
Int J Audiol ; 61(12): 1035-1044, 2022 12.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34851208
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Compare the relative efficacy of DesyncraTM and Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT). DESIGN AND STUDY SAMPLE Sixty-one participants were randomly assigned to receive either DesyncraTM (n = 29) or CBT (n = 32). Randomisation included stratification regarding current hearing aid (HA) use. Depending on group assignment, participants attended approximately 7-12 visits. Tinnitus distress was measured using the Tinnitus Questionnaire (TQ).

RESULTS:

Mean TQ scores decreased post-baseline from 5-15 points across treatment arms and strata. Model-based findings for the no-HA stratum showed a difference of -2.0 TQ points favouring Desyncra at 24-weeks, with a 90% posterior interval varying from -5.4 points favouring Desyncra to 0.8 TQ points favouring CBT. For the HA stratum, results show a difference of -1.0 TQ points favouring Desyncra, with a 90% posterior interval ranging from -4.7 points favouring Desyncra to 2.9 points favouring CBT.

CONCLUSIONS:

The difference between Desyncra and CBT on average showed greater improvement with Desyncra in the no-HA stratum by about 2 TQ points. To the extent that the study sample represents a clinical population and recognising the assumptions in the design and analysis, these results suggest Desyncra is just as effective or more so than CBT in reducing tinnitus distress.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Acúfeno / Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual / Audífonos Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Int J Audiol Asunto de la revista: AUDIOLOGIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Acúfeno / Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual / Audífonos Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Int J Audiol Asunto de la revista: AUDIOLOGIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos