Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Response properties of optic flow neurons in the accessory optic system of hummingbirds versus zebra finches and pigeons.
Gaede, Andrea H; Baliga, Vikram B; Smyth, Graham; Gutiérrez-Ibáñez, Cristian; Altshuler, Douglas L; Wylie, Douglas R.
Afiliación
  • Gaede AH; Structure and Motion Laboratory, Royal Veterinary College, University of London, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom.
  • Baliga VB; Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
  • Smyth G; Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
  • Gutiérrez-Ibáñez C; Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
  • Altshuler DL; Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
  • Wylie DR; Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
J Neurophysiol ; 127(1): 130-144, 2022 01 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34851761
Optokinetic responses function to maintain retinal image stabilization by minimizing optic flow that occurs during self-motion. The hovering ability of hummingbirds is an extreme example of this behavior. Optokinetic responses are mediated by direction-selective neurons with large receptive fields in the accessory optic system (AOS) and pretectum. Recent studies in hummingbirds showed that, compared with other bird species, 1) the pretectal nucleus lentiformis mesencephali (LM) is hypertrophied, 2) LM has a unique distribution of direction preferences, and 3) LM neurons are more tightly tuned to stimulus velocity. In this study, we sought to determine if there are concomitant changes in the nucleus of the basal optic root (nBOR) of the AOS. We recorded the visual response properties of nBOR neurons to large-field-drifting random dot patterns and sine-wave gratings in Anna's hummingbirds and zebra finches and compared these with archival data from pigeons. We found no differences with respect to the distribution of direction preferences: Neurons responsive to upward, downward, and nasal-to-temporal motion were equally represented in all three species, and neurons responsive to temporal-to-nasal motion were rare or absent (<5%). Compared with zebra finches and pigeons, however, hummingbird nBOR neurons were more tightly tuned to stimulus velocity of random dot stimuli. Moreover, in response to drifting gratings, hummingbird nBOR neurons are more tightly tuned in the spatiotemporal domain. These results, in combination with specialization in LM, support a hypothesis that hummingbirds have evolved to be "optic flow specialists" to cope with the optomotor demands of sustained hovering flight.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Hummingbirds have specialized response properties to optic flow in the pretectal nucleus lentiformis mesencephali (LM). The LM works with the nucleus of the basal optic root (nBOR) of the accessory optic system (AOS) to process global visual motion, but whether the neural response specializations observed in the LM extend to the nBOR is unknown. Hummingbird nBOR neurons are more tightly tuned to visual stimulus velocity, and in the spatiotemporal domain, compared with two nonhovering species.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Reconocimiento Visual de Modelos / Aves / Mesencéfalo / Flujo Optico / Percepción de Movimiento / Neuronas Límite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: J Neurophysiol Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Reconocimiento Visual de Modelos / Aves / Mesencéfalo / Flujo Optico / Percepción de Movimiento / Neuronas Límite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: J Neurophysiol Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido