Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Biopsy in Active Surveillance of Prostate Cancer.
Kinnaird, Adam; Yerram, Nitin K; O'Connor, Luke; Brisbane, Wayne; Sharma, Vidit; Chuang, Ryan; Jayadevan, Rajiv; Ahdoot, Michael; Daneshvar, Michael; Priester, Alan; Delfin, Merdie; Tran, Elizabeth; Barsa, Danielle E; Sisk, Anthony; Reiter, Robert E; Felker, Ely; Raman, Steve; Kwan, Lorna; Choyke, Peter L; Merino, Maria J; Wood, Bradford J; Turkbey, Baris; Pinto, Peter A; Marks, Leonard S.
Afiliación
  • Kinnaird A; Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, California.
  • Yerram NK; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
  • O'Connor L; Alberta Centre for Urologic Research and Excellence (ACURE), Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
  • Brisbane W; Cancer Research Institute of Northern Alberta (CRINA),Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
  • Sharma V; Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Chuang R; Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Jayadevan R; Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, California.
  • Ahdoot M; Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, California.
  • Daneshvar M; Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, California.
  • Priester A; Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, California.
  • Delfin M; Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Tran E; Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Barsa DE; Department of Bioengineering, UCLA, Los Angeles, California.
  • Sisk A; Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, California.
  • Reiter RE; Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, California.
  • Felker E; Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, California.
  • Raman S; Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, California.
  • Kwan L; Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, California.
  • Choyke PL; Department of Radiological Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, California.
  • Merino MJ; Department of Radiological Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, California.
  • Wood BJ; Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, California.
  • Turkbey B; Molecular Imaging Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Pinto PA; Laboratory of Pathology, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Marks LS; Center for Interventional Oncology, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
J Urol ; 207(4): 823-831, 2022 04.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34854746
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

The underlying premise of prostate cancer active surveillance (AS) is that cancers likely to metastasize will be recognized and eliminated before cancer-related disease can ensue. Our study was designed to determine the prostate cancer upgrading rate when biopsy guided by magnetic resonance imaging (MRGBx) is used before entry and during AS. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

The cohort included 519 men with low- or intermediate-risk prostate cancer who enrolled in prospective studies (NCT00949819 and NCT00102544) between February 2008 and February 2020. Subjects were preliminarily diagnosed with Gleason Grade Group (GG) 1 cancer; AS began when subsequent MRGBx confirmed GG1 or GG2. Participants underwent confirmatory MRGBx (targeted and systematic) followed by surveillance MRGBx approximately every 12 to 24 months. The primary outcome was tumor upgrading to ≥GG3.

RESULTS:

Upgrading to ≥GG3 was found in 92 men after a median followup of 4.8 years (IQR 3.1-6.5) after confirmatory MRGBx. Upgrade-free probability after 5 years was 0.85 (95% CI 0.81-0.88). Cancer detected in a magnetic resonance imaging lesion at confirmatory MRGBx increased risk of subsequent upgrading during AS (HR 2.8; 95% CI 1.3-6.0), as did presence of GG2 (HR 2.9; 95% CI 1.1-8.2) In men who upgraded ≥GG3 during AS, upgrading was detected by targeted cores only in 27%, systematic cores only in 25% and both in 47%. In 63 men undergoing prostatectomy, upgrading from MRGBx was found in only 5 (8%).

CONCLUSIONS:

When AS begins and follows with MRGBx (targeted and systematic), upgrading rate (≥GG3) is greater when tumor is initially present within a magnetic resonance imaging lesion or when pathology is GG2 than when these features are absent.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Próstata / Imagen por Resonancia Magnética / Espera Vigilante / Biopsia Guiada por Imagen Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Límite: Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Urol Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Próstata / Imagen por Resonancia Magnética / Espera Vigilante / Biopsia Guiada por Imagen Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Límite: Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Urol Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article