Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Pediatric musculoskeletal pathologies: are there differences in triage of diagnoses and preferences for communication between radiology and orthopedics?
Hussaini, Syed H; Gaballah, Marian; Baghdadi, Soroush; Arkader, Alexandre; Williams, Brendan A; Sze, Raymond W; Nguyen, Jie C.
Afiliación
  • Hussaini SH; Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3401 Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
  • Gaballah M; Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3401 Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
  • Baghdadi S; Divison of Orthopedic Surgery, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Arkader A; Divison of Orthopedic Surgery, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Williams BA; University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Sze RW; Divison of Orthopedic Surgery, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Nguyen JC; University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Skeletal Radiol ; 51(4): 863-871, 2022 Apr.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34862516
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To define the clinical importance of various pediatric musculoskeletal diagnoses, determine preferred communication methods based on the acuity level of findings, and investigate differences between specialties utilizing the Delphi methodology.

METHODS:

Radiologists, orthopedic surgeons, and sports-medicine pediatricians at a tertiary children's hospital were surveyed (n = 79) twice using REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture). Surveys were conducted anonymously and at least 1 year apart, first eliciting all potentially non-routine findings and various communication methods (round 1), and later categorizing the acuity (emergent, urgent, or non-urgent) of different diagnosis categories and selecting the preferred communication method (verbal, written electronic messages, and report) and timeframe (round 2). Chi-square, Fisher's exact, and Kruskal-Wallis H tests were used to compare variables between specialties.

RESULTS:

Round 1 produced 267 entries for non-routine findings (grouped into 19 diagnoses) and 71 for communication methods (grouped into 3 categories). Round 2 found no significant difference in the acuity assignments for the 19 predetermined diagnoses (p = 0.66) between the 3 specialties; however, there was reduced agreement for the top urgent diagnoses within and between specialties. Most pediatricians preferred written electronic messages. The preferred communication timeframe for urgent diagnoses was significantly different (< 2 h for pediatricians, < 4 h for radiologists, and < 8 h for surgeons; p = 0.003) between specialties whereas no difference was found for emergent (p = 1) and non-urgent diagnoses (p = 0.80).

CONCLUSION:

Acuity assignment for the 19 pediatric-specific musculoskeletal diagnoses was not significantly different between specialties, but the preferred communication timeframe for urgent diagnoses was significantly different, ranging between 2 and 8 h.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Ortopedia / Radiología / Sistema Musculoesquelético Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies Límite: Child / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Skeletal Radiol Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Ortopedia / Radiología / Sistema Musculoesquelético Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies Límite: Child / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Skeletal Radiol Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos