Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Identifying factors that promote and limit the effective use of real-time patient experience feedback: a mixed-methods study in secondary care.
Khanbhai, Mustafa; Flott, Kelsey; Manton, Dave; Harrison-White, Stephanie; Klaber, Robert; Darzi, Ara; Mayer, Erik.
Afiliación
  • Khanbhai M; Imperial College London, NIHR Patient and Safety Translational Research Centre, London, UK m.khanbhai@imperial.ac.uk.
  • Flott K; Imperial College London, NIHR Patient and Safety Translational Research Centre, London, UK.
  • Manton D; Imperial College London, NIHR Patient and Safety Translational Research Centre, London, UK.
  • Harrison-White S; Patient Experience Office, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
  • Klaber R; Strategy, Research and Innovation, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
  • Darzi A; Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
  • Mayer E; Imperial College London, NIHR Patient and Safety Translational Research Centre, London, UK.
BMJ Open ; 11(12): e047239, 2021 12 08.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34880009
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

The Friends and Family Test (FFT) is commissioned by the National Health Service (NHS) in England to capture patient experience as a real-time feedback initiative for patient-centred quality improvement (QI). The aim of this study was to create a process map in order to identify the factors that promote and limit the effective use of FFT as a real-time feedback initiative for patient-centred QI.

SETTING:

This study was conducted at a large London NHS Trust. Services include accident and emergency, inpatient, outpatient and maternity, which routinely collect FFT patient experience data.

PARTICIPANTS:

Healthcare staff and key stakeholders involved in FFT.

INTERVENTIONS:

Semi-structured interviews were conducted on 15 participants from a broad range of professional groups to evaluate their engagement with the FFT. Interview data were recorded, transcribed and analysed for using deductive thematic analysis.

RESULTS:

Concerns related to inefficiency in the flow of FFT data, lack of time to analyse FFT reports (with emphasis on high level reporting rather than QI), insufficient access to FFT reports and limited training provided to understand FFT reports for frontline staff. The sheer volume of data received was not amenable to manual thematic analysis resulting in inability to acquire insight from the free text. This resulted in staff ambivalence towards FFT as a near real-time feedback initiative.

CONCLUSIONS:

The results state that there is too much FFT free text for meaningful analysis, and the output is limited to the provision of sufficient capacity and resource to analyse the data, without consideration of other options, such as text analytics and amending the data collection tool.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Medicina Estatal / Atención Secundaria de Salud Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Límite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Medicina Estatal / Atención Secundaria de Salud Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Límite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido