Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The effects of artificial- and stevia-based sweeteners on lipid profile in adults: a GRADE-assessed systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression of randomized clinical trials.
Movahedian, Mina; Golzan, S Amirhossein; Ashtary-Larky, Damoon; Clark, Cain C T; Asbaghi, Omid; Hekmatdoost, Azita.
Afiliación
  • Movahedian M; Student Research Committee, Department of Clinical Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Nutrition and Food Technology, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  • Golzan SA; Student Research Committee, Department of Food Science and Technology, National Nutrition and Food Technology Research Institute, Faculty of Nutrition Science and Food Technology, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  • Ashtary-Larky D; Nutrition and Metabolic Diseases Research Center, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.
  • Clark CCT; Centre for Intelligent Healthcare, Coventry University, Coventry, UK.
  • Asbaghi O; Cancer Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  • Hekmatdoost A; Department of Clinical Nutrition & Dietetics, Faculty of Nutrition Sciences and Food Technology, National Nutrition and Food Technology Research Institute, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr ; 63(21): 5063-5079, 2023.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34882023
ABSTRACT
It has been posited that Non-nutritive sweeteners (NNS) intake may affect lipid profile. However, its proven effects on lipid profile are unclear, as clinical studies on this topic have produced inconsistent results. To fill this gap in knowledge, this systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) sought to evaluate the effects of artificial- and stevia-based sweeteners consumption on lipid profile markers. To identify eligible RCTs, a systematic search up to April 2021 was completed in PubMed/Medline, Scopus, and EMBASE, using relevant keywords. A random-effect model was utilized to estimate the weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95% confidence (95% CI) for TG, TC, and LDL. On the other hand, a fixed-effect model was used to estimate the WMD and 95% CI for HDL. Fourteen RCTs were included in the present meta-analysis. The pooled analysis revealed that NNS did not affect TG (WMD-1.31, 95% CI-5.89, 3.27 mg/dl), TC (WMD-2.27,95% CI-7.61,3.07 mg/dl), LDL (WMD1,95% CI -2.72, 4.71 mg/dl), and HDL (WMD0.06, 95% CI-0.62,0.73 mg/dl). Subgroup analysis showed that NNS may be related to a small, but statistically significant, increase in LDL (WMD4.23, 95% CI0.50,7.96 mg/dl) in subjects with normal levels of LDL (<100 mg/dl). We found that consumption of artificial- and stevia-based sweeteners is not associated with lipid profile changes in adults. This study has been registered at PROSPERO (registration number CRD42021250025).
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Stevia / Edulcorantes no Nutritivos Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Límite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr Asunto de la revista: CIENCIAS DA NUTRICAO Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Irán

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Stevia / Edulcorantes no Nutritivos Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Límite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr Asunto de la revista: CIENCIAS DA NUTRICAO Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Irán