Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Lupus band test for diagnostic evaluation in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Wongtada, Chanidapa; Kerr, Stephen J; Rerknimitr, Pawinee.
Afiliación
  • Wongtada C; Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Skin and Allergy Research Unit, 26683Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
  • Kerr SJ; Center for Excellence in Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine, 26683Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
  • Rerknimitr P; Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Skin and Allergy Research Unit, 26683Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Lupus ; 31(3): 363-366, 2022 Mar.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34986687
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The lupus band test (LBT) using a sample of clinically normal skin was proposed as a useful diagnostic test for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). It is mostly performed to help diagnosing SLE in patients with insufficient clinical and serological profiles. However, most published studies on its utility are outdated and the results remain controversial.

OBJECTIVES:

To determine the diagnostic performance of LBT on non-lesion sun-protected (NLSP) and sun-exposed (NLSE) skin for SLE.

METHODS:

Consecutively presenting patients with clinical and serological suspicion of SLE who had LBT performed on non-lesion skin during January 2012 to August 2021 were retrospectively studied. LBT performed on either NLSE or NLSP skin biopsies were all included. Laboratory characteristics, number, types and patterns of deposited immunoreactants and disease activity were also assessed.

RESULTS:

LBT was performed in 57 patients with suspected SLE. LBT was positive in 18/57, 9/28 and 6/21 patients in overall non-lesion, NLSE and NLSP, respectively. Of all patients, 23 patients were diagnosed with SLE and 34 patients with other diseases. Overall, the sensitivity and specificity of LBT on non-lesion skin was 56.5% and 88.2%, respectively. The ability of the test to discriminate between those with and without SLE, assessed by the area under the Receiver-Operating Characteristic curve, was 0.72 (0.61-0.84). The sensitivity and specificity of LBT on NLSE skin was 58.3% and 87.5% while those of NLSP skin, were 57.1% and 85.7%, respectively. We found no significant correlation between the positivity of LBT and overall disease activity. Types, number and pattern of deposited immunoreactants also showed no correlation with disease activity (all p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS:

Used as a diagnostic adjunct, non-lesion LBT is still of value for diagnosing SLE in inconclusive cases.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Enfermedades de la Piel / Lupus Eritematoso Discoide / Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Lupus Asunto de la revista: REUMATOLOGIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Tailandia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Enfermedades de la Piel / Lupus Eritematoso Discoide / Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Lupus Asunto de la revista: REUMATOLOGIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Tailandia