Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Can nuclear imaging accurately detect scar in ischemic cardiac resynchronization therapy candidates?
Degtiarova, Ganna; Claus, Piet; Duchenne, Jürgen; Schramm, Georg; Nuyts, Johan; Bogaert, Jan; Vöros, Gabor; Willems, Rik; Verberne, Hein J; Voigt, Jens-Uwe; Gheysens, Olivier.
Afiliación
  • Degtiarova G; Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven.
  • Claus P; Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University Hospitals Leuven.
  • Duchenne J; Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, KU Leuven.
  • Schramm G; Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, KU Leuven.
  • Nuyts J; Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, University Hospitals Leuven.
  • Bogaert J; Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven.
  • Vöros G; Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven.
  • Willems R; Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Verberne HJ; Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, KU Leuven.
  • Voigt JU; Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, University Hospitals Leuven.
  • Gheysens O; Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, KU Leuven.
Nucl Med Commun ; 43(5): 502-509, 2022 May 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35045554
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Accurate scar assessment is crucial in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) candidates, since its presence is a negative predictor for CRT response. Therefore, we assessed the performance of different PET parameters to detect scar in CRT candidates.

METHODS:

Twenty-nine CRT candidates underwent 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG)-PET/computed tomography (CT), resting 13N-NH3-PET/CT and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) prior to CRT implantation. Segmental 18F-FDG uptake, late 13N-NH3 uptake and absolute myocardial blood flow (MBF) were evaluated for scar detection using late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) CMR as reference. A receiver operator characteristic (ROC) area under the curve (AUC) ≥0.8 indicated a good accuracy of the methods evaluated.

RESULTS:

Scar was present in 111 of 464 segments. None of the approaches could reliably identify segments with nontransmural scar, except for 18F-FDG uptake in the lateral wall (AUC 0.83). Segmental transmural scars could be detected with all methods (AUC ≥ 0.8), except for septal 18F-FDG uptake and MBF in the inferior wall (AUC < 0.8). Late 13N-NH3 uptake was the best parameter for transmural scar detection, independent of its location, with a sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 92% using a cutoff of 66% of the maximum tracer activity.

CONCLUSIONS:

Late 13N-NH3 uptake is superior to 13N-NH3 MBF and 18F-FDG in detecting transmural scar, independently of its location. However, none of the tested PET parameters was able to accurately detect nontransmural scar.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Fluorodesoxiglucosa F18 / Terapia de Resincronización Cardíaca Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Nucl Med Commun Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Fluorodesoxiglucosa F18 / Terapia de Resincronización Cardíaca Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Nucl Med Commun Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article