Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Long-term outcomes of the four-corner fusion of the wrist: A systematic review.
Andronic, Octavian; Nagy, Ladislav; Burkhard, Marco D; Casari, Fabio A; Karczewski, Daniel; Kriechling, Philipp; Schweizer, Andreas; Jud, Lukas.
Afiliación
  • Andronic O; Department of Orthopaedics, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zürich, Switzerland, Zürich 8008, Switzerland. octavian.andronic@balgrist.ch.
  • Nagy L; Department of Orthopaedics, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zürich, Switzerland, Zürich 8008, Switzerland.
  • Burkhard MD; Department of Orthopaedics, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zürich, Switzerland, Zürich 8008, Switzerland.
  • Casari FA; Department of Orthopaedics, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zürich, Switzerland, Zürich 8008, Switzerland.
  • Karczewski D; Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Charitè University Medicine Berlin, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Berlin 10117, Germany.
  • Kriechling P; Department of Orthopaedics, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zürich, Switzerland, Zürich 8008, Switzerland.
  • Schweizer A; Department of Orthopaedics, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zürich, Switzerland, Zürich 8008, Switzerland.
  • Jud L; Department of Orthopaedics, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zürich, Switzerland, Zürich 8008, Switzerland.
World J Orthop ; 13(1): 112-121, 2022 Jan 18.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35096541
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Four-corner fusion (4CF) is a motion sparing salvage procedure that is used to treat osteoarthritis secondary to advanced scapholunate collapse or longstanding scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse. Little is known about the long-term survivorship and outcomes of 4CF.

AIM:

To report on clinical and functional long-term outcomes as well as conversion rates to total wrist fusion or arthroplasty.

METHODS:

The systematic review protocol was registered in the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) and followed the PRISMA guidelines. Original articles were screened using four different databases. Studies with a minimum Level IV of evidence that reported on long-term outcome after 4CF with a minimum follow-up of 5 years were included. Quality assessment was performed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies criteria.

RESULTS:

A total of 11 studies including 436 wrists with a mean follow-up of 11 ± 4 years (range 6-18 years) was included. Quality assessment according to Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies criteria tool averaged 69% ± 11% (range 50%-87%). Fusion rate could be extracted from 9/11 studies and averaged 91%. Patient-reported outcomes were extracted at last follow-up from 8 studies with an average visual analog scale of 1 ± 1 (range 0-2) and across 9 studies with an average Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score of 21 ± 8 (range 8-37). At last follow-up, the cumulative conversion rate to total wrist fusion averaged 6%. There were no conversions to total wrist arthroplasty.

CONCLUSION:

The 4CF of the wrist is a reliable surgical technique, capable of achieving a good long-term patient satisfaction and survivorship with low rates of conversion to total wrist fusion.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: World J Orthop Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Suiza

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: World J Orthop Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Suiza