Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Utility based approach in individualized optimal dose selection using machine learning methods.
Li, Pin; Taylor, Jeremy M G; Boonstra, Philip S; Lawrence, Theodore S; Schipper, Matthew J.
Afiliación
  • Li P; Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
  • Taylor JMG; Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
  • Boonstra PS; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
  • Lawrence TS; Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
  • Schipper MJ; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Stat Med ; 41(16): 2957-2977, 2022 07 20.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35343595
ABSTRACT
The goal in personalized medicine is to individualize treatment using patient characteristics and improve health outcomes. Selection of optimal dose must balance the effect of dose on both treatment efficacy and toxicity outcomes. We consider a setting with one binary efficacy and one binary toxicity outcome. The goal is to find the optimal dose for each patient using clinical features and biomarkers from available dataset. We propose to use flexible machine learning methods such as random forest and Gaussian process models to build models for efficacy and toxicity depending on dose and biomarkers. A copula is used to model the joint distribution of the two outcomes and the estimates are constrained to have non-decreasing dose-efficacy and dose-toxicity relationships. Numerical utilities are elicited from clinicians for each potential bivariate outcome. For each patient, the optimal dose is chosen to maximize the posterior mean of the utility function. We also propose alternative approaches to optimal dose selection by adding additional toxicity based constraints and an approach taking into account the uncertainty in the estimation of the utility function. The proposed methods are evaluated in a simulation study to compare expected utility outcomes under various estimated optimal dose rules. Gaussian process models tended to have better performance than random forest. Enforcing monotonicity during modeling provided small benefits. Whether and how, correlation between efficacy and toxicity, was modeled, had little effect on performance. The proposed methods are illustrated with a study of patients with liver cancer treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Aprendizaje Automático Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Stat Med Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Aprendizaje Automático Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Stat Med Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos