Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Randomized controlled trial investigating use of submucosal injection of EverLift™ in rates of complete resection of non-pedunculated 4-9 mm polyps.
Wei, Mike T; Louie, Christine Y; Chen, Yu; Pan, Jennifer Y; Quan, Susan Y; Wong, Robert; Brown, Ryanne; Clark, Melissa; Jensen, Kristin; Lau, Hubert; Friedland, Shai.
Afiliación
  • Wei MT; Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. mtwei@stanford.edu.
  • Louie CY; Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health System, Palo Alto, CA, USA. mtwei@stanford.edu.
  • Chen Y; Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
  • Pan JY; Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health System, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
  • Quan SY; Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
  • Wong R; Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health System, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
  • Brown R; Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
  • Clark M; Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health System, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
  • Jensen K; Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
  • Lau H; Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health System, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
  • Friedland S; Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Int J Colorectal Dis ; 37(6): 1273-1279, 2022 Jun.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35507047
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Currently, cold snare polypectomy (CSP) without submucosal injection is recommended for removing polyps < 10 mm. Use of viscous submucosal agents has not been previously evaluated in CSP. We investigate the potential role of EverLift™ (GI Supply, Pennsylvania) in CSP.

METHODS:

The study is a single-center prospective randomized non-inferiority clinical trial evaluating CSP of non-pedunculated 4-9 mm polyps, with or without submucosal injection of EverLift™. Patients 18-80 years of age presenting for colonoscopy were recruited. Eligible polyps underwent block randomization to CSP with or without EverLift™. Following CSP, two biopsies were performed at the CSP site margin. The primary non-inferiority outcome was complete resection rate, defined by absence of residual polyp in the margin biopsies (non-inferiority margin -10%).

RESULTS:

A total of 291 eligible polyps underwent CSP, with 142 removed using EverLift™. There was similar polyp size and distribution of pathology between the two groups. Overall, there was a low rate of positive margins with (1.4%) or without submucosal injection (2.8%), with no significant difference in complete resection (difference 1.28%, 95% CI -2.66 to 5.42%), demonstrating non-inferiority of EverLift™ injection. Use of EverLift™ significantly increased CSP time (109.8 vs 38.8 s, p < 0.0001) and frequency of use of hemostatic clips (13.4 vs 3.6%, p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION:

Submucosal injection of EverLift™ was non-inferior to CSP of 4-9 mm polyps without injection and increased time for resection as well as use of hemostatic clips to control acute bleeding. Our results suggest that polypectomy of 4-9 mm polyps can be safely performed without submucosal injection of EverLift™.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Hemostáticos / Neoplasias Colorrectales / Pólipos del Colon Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Int J Colorectal Dis Asunto de la revista: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Hemostáticos / Neoplasias Colorrectales / Pólipos del Colon Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Int J Colorectal Dis Asunto de la revista: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos