Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact of Cost Conversations During Clinical Encounters Aided by Shared Decision-Making Tools on Medication Adherence.
Espinoza Suarez, Nataly R; Urtecho, Meritxell; LaVecchia, Christina M; Fischer, Karen M; Kamath, Celia C; Brito, Juan P.
Afiliación
  • Espinoza Suarez NR; Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
  • Urtecho M; VITAM-Centre for Sustainable Health Research, Laval University, Quebec City, QC, Canada.
  • LaVecchia CM; Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
  • Fischer KM; Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
  • Kamath CC; Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
  • Brito JP; Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes ; 6(4): 320-326, 2022 Aug.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35782878
ABSTRACT

Objective:

To investigate the impact of cost conversations occurring with or without the use of encounter shared decision-making (SDM) tools in medication adherence. Patients and

Methods:

Using a coding scheme that included the occurrence and characteristics of cost conversation, we analyzed a randomly selected sample of 169 video recordings of clinical encounters. These videos were obtained during the conduct of practice-based randomized clinical trials comparing care with and without SDM tools for patients with diabetes, osteoporosis, and depression. Medication adherence was described in 2 ways as a binary (yes/no) outcome, in which the patient met at least 80% adherence, or as a continuous variable, which was the percent of days that the patient adhered to their medication. The secondary analysis took place in 2018 from trials that ran between 2007 and 2015.

Results:

Most patients were White (155, 93.4%), educated (104, 63.4% completed college), middle-aged (mean age, 58 years), female (104, 61.5%), and from diabetes (86, 50.9%), depression (43, 25.4%), and osteoporosis (40, 23.7%) trials. Cost conversations occurred in 119 clinical encounters (70%) and were more frequent in those encounters in which SDM tools were used (P=.03). Furthermore, 97 (57.4%) of the participants reported more than 80% medication adherence and 70.3±29.34 percentage of days with adherent medication of 70 days. In the multiple regression model, the only factor associated with adherence (binary or continuous) was the condition of the trial in which people participated. For the participants who had cost conversations, the use of an SDM tool, their sex, the nature of cost conversation (direct or indirect), the nature of cost concerns (treatment or patient issue), and the clinician-offered strategies (yes or no) were not associated with adherence.

Conclusion:

In this videographic analysis of SDM practice-based clinical trials, cost conversations were not associated with the general measures of medication adherence. Future studies should assess whether a tailored cost conversation intervention would impact the cost-related nonadherence among patients.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Mongolia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Mongolia