Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Connectome-based individualized prediction of reciprocity propensity and sensitivity to framing: a resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging study.
Fang, Huihua; Liao, Chong; Fu, Zhao; Tian, Shuang; Luo, Yuejia; Xu, Pengfei; Krueger, Frank.
Afiliación
  • Fang H; Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Affective and Social Neuroscience, Magnetic Resonance Imaging Center, Center for Brain Disorders and Cognitive Sciences, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China.
  • Liao C; Department of Psychology, University of Mannheim, Mannheim 68131, Germany.
  • Fu Z; Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Affective and Social Neuroscience, Magnetic Resonance Imaging Center, Center for Brain Disorders and Cognitive Sciences, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China.
  • Tian S; Department of Psychology, University of Mannheim, Mannheim 68131, Germany.
  • Luo Y; Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Affective and Social Neuroscience, Magnetic Resonance Imaging Center, Center for Brain Disorders and Cognitive Sciences, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China.
  • Xu P; Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Affective and Social Neuroscience, Magnetic Resonance Imaging Center, Center for Brain Disorders and Cognitive Sciences, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China.
  • Krueger F; Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Affective and Social Neuroscience, Magnetic Resonance Imaging Center, Center for Brain Disorders and Cognitive Sciences, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China.
Cereb Cortex ; 33(6): 3193-3206, 2023 03 10.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35788651
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The social representation theory states that individual differences in reciprocity decisions are composed of a stable central core (i.e., reciprocity propensity, RP) and a contextual-dependent periphery (i.e., sensitivity to the framing effect; SFE, the effect by how the decision is presented). However, the neural underpinnings that explain RP and SFE are still unknown.

METHOD:

Here, we employed prediction and lesion models to decode resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC) of RP and SFE for reciprocity decisions of healthy volunteers who underwent RS functional magnetic resonance imaging and completed one-shot trust (give frame) and distrust (take frame) games as trustees.

RESULTS:

Regarding the central core, reciprocity rates were positively associated between the give and take frame. Neuroimaging results showed that inter-network RSFC between the default-mode network (DMN; associated with mentalizing) and cingulo-opercular network (associated with cognitive control) contributed to the prediction of reciprocity under both frames. Regarding the periphery, behavioral results demonstrated a significant framing effect-people reciprocated more in the give than in the take frame. Our neuroimaging results revealed that intra-network RSFC of DMN (associated with mentalizing) contributed dominantly to the prediction of SFE.

CONCLUSION:

Our findings provide evidence for distinct neural mechanisms of RP and SFE in reciprocity decisions.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Conectoma Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Cereb Cortex Asunto de la revista: CEREBRO Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Conectoma Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Cereb Cortex Asunto de la revista: CEREBRO Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China