Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Return of comprehensive tumour genomic profiling results to advanced cancer patients: a qualitative study.
Best, Megan C; Bartley, Nicci; Napier, Christine E; Fisher, Alana; Ballinger, Mandy L; Thomas, David M; Goldstein, David; Tucker, Katherine; Biesecker, Barbara B; Butow, Phyllis.
Afiliación
  • Best MC; Institute for Ethics and Society, University of Notre Dame Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia. megan.best@nd.edu.au.
  • Bartley N; Psycho-Oncology Co-Operative Research Group (PoCoG), University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  • Napier CE; Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  • Fisher A; School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  • Ballinger ML; Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  • Thomas DM; University of New South Wales, St Vincent's Clinical School, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  • Goldstein D; Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  • Tucker K; University of New South Wales, St Vincent's Clinical School, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  • Biesecker BB; Prince of Wales Hospital, Dept of Medical Oncology, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  • Butow P; Prince of Wales Medical School, Hereditary Cancer Centre, University of New South Wales, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, NSW, Australia.
Support Care Cancer ; 30(10): 8201-8210, 2022 Oct.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35809119
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

The introduction of comprehensive tumour genomic profiling (CGP) into clinical oncology allows the identification of molecular therapeutic targets. However, the potential complexity of genomic results and their implications may cause confusion and distress for patients undergoing CGP. We investigated the experience of advanced cancer patients receiving CGP results in a research setting.

METHODS:

Semi-structured interviews with 37 advanced cancer patients were conducted within two weeks of patients receiving CGP results. Interviewees were purposively sampled based on CGP result, cancer type, age and gender to ensure diversity. Themes were derived from interview transcripts using a framework analysis approach.

RESULTS:

We identified six themes (1) hoping against the odds; (2) managing expectations; (3) understanding is cursory; (4) communication of results is cursory; (5) genomics and incurable cancer; and (6) decisions about treatment.

CONCLUSION:

Despite enthusiasm regarding CGP about the hope it provides for new treatments, participants experienced challenges in understanding results, and acceptance of identified treatments was not automatic. Support is needed for patients undergoing CGP to understand the implications of testing and cope with non-actionable results.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Genómica / Neoplasias Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Support Care Cancer Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS / SERVICOS DE SAUDE Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Genómica / Neoplasias Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Support Care Cancer Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS / SERVICOS DE SAUDE Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia