Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The usefulness of YouTube videos as a source of information in asthma.
Diers, Caroline Skovsgaard; Remvig, Celine; Meteran, Hanieh; Thomsen, Simon Francis; Sigsgaard, Torben; Høj, Simon; Meteran, Howraman.
Afiliación
  • Diers CS; Faculty of Health and Medical Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Remvig C; Faculty of Health and Medical Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Meteran H; Clinical Oncology and Palliative Care, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark.
  • Thomsen SF; Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Wound Healing Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital-Bispebjerg, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Sigsgaard T; Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Høj S; Department of Public Health, Environment, Occupation and Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
  • Meteran H; Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark.
J Asthma ; 60(4): 737-743, 2023 04.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35837808
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Patient education is a key element in the management of asthma.

AIMS:

This study aimed to evaluate the popularity and usefulness of YouTube videos on asthma.

METHODS:

Two authors screened and evaluated the 200 most popular videos. Data on likes, dislikes, views, comment, source of uploader, days since upload, and usefulness were recorded and included for analyses. The usefulness of the videos was categorized as follows useful, misleading, or neutral. Misleading videos provided at least one scientifically incorrect detail, whereas useful videos contained scientifically correct information.

RESULTS:

A total of 130 videos were included, and the total number of views was 100,290,242 with a total duration of 29 h and 8 min. While 26.6% of videos were uploaded by TV shows and YouTube channels, only 7.7% were uploaded by lung specialists. 65.4% of the videos contained scientifically correct information, whereas 18.5% contained misleading information. Although videos from medical professionals had a higher quality than videos from YouTube channels and TV shows, the latter were more popular. Misleading videos had numerically, but not statistically significant higher views compared with useful videos.

CONCLUSIONS:

YouTube videos on asthma are popular in terms of viewer interaction, and the popularity is not restricted to videos uploaded by professional sources. Although more than half of the videos were found to be useful, a non-negligible proportion of videos were assessed as misleading. The usefulness of YouTube videos on asthma is variable and initiatives should be taken to increase the potential of YouTube as an useful source in patient education.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Asma / Medios de Comunicación Sociales Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Asthma Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Dinamarca

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Asma / Medios de Comunicación Sociales Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Asthma Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Dinamarca