Effectiveness and safety of intracranial events associated with the use of direct oral anticoagulants for atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 92 studies.

ABSTRACT

AIMS: Observational studies have investigated the effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) used in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the risk of ischaemic stroke, thromboembolism (TE) and intracranial haemorrhage (ICH) associated with the use of DOACs and VKAs. METHODS: Medline and Embase were systematically searched until April 2021. Observational studies were gathered and hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were extracted. Subgroup analyses based on DOAC doses, history of chronic kidney disease, stroke, exposure to VKA, age and sex were performed. A random-effects model was used. RESULTS: We included 92 studies and performed 107 comparisons. Apixaban was associated with lower risk of stroke (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.68-0.99) compared to dabigatran. Rivaroxaban was associated with lower risk of stroke (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.83-0.98) compared to VKA. Dabigatran (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.80-0.91), rivaroxaban (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.77-0.89) and apixaban (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.65-0.86) were associated with lower risk for TE/stroke compared to VKA. Apixaban (HR 1.32, 95% CI 1.03-1.68) and rivaroxaban (HR 1.58, 95% CI 1.31-1.89) were associated with higher risk of ICH compared to dabigatran. Dabigatran (HR 0.48, 95% CI 0.44-0.52), apixaban (HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.49-0.73) and rivaroxaban (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.65-0.81) were associated with lower risk of ICH compared to VKA. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated significant differences in the risk of ischaemic stroke, TE/stroke and ICH associated with individual DOACs compared to both other DOACs and VKA.