Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact of a Palatal Fistula After Cleft Palate Repair on Velopharyngeal Closure.
Geisman, Mackenzie M; Skolnick, Gary B; Grames, Lynn M; Naidoo, Sybill D; Snyder-Warwick, Alison K; Patel, Kamlesh B.
Afiliación
  • Geisman MM; Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
  • Skolnick GB; Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
  • Grames LM; St. Louis Children's Hospital, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
  • Naidoo SD; Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
  • Snyder-Warwick AK; Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
  • Patel KB; Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Cleft Palate Craniofac J ; 61(1): 61-67, 2024 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35912430
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

A palatal fistula is an adverse outcome of cleft palate repair. It is unknown if a palatal fistula will influence velopharyngeal closure, even after repair of the fistula. This study determines the effect of a soft palate fistula on the risk of developing velopharyngeal insufficiency.

METHODS:

A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients who underwent primary cleft palate repair between 2000 and 2015, with complete records at 4 years of age. Fistulae involving the secondary palate following primary palatoplasty were classified as the soft or hard palate. A forced-entry multivariate logistic regression model was built to detect predictors of velopharyngeal dysfunction.

RESULTS:

Records of 329 patients were analyzed with a mean follow-up of 8.7 years. A palatal fistula was identified in 89/329 patients (27%) and 29/329 patients (9%) underwent an independent fistula repair. Of the patients with fistula, 44% were located in the hard palate only and 56% had soft palate involvement. Compared to patients without a fistula, rates of velopharyngeal dysfunction were significantly higher in patients with a fistula involving the soft palate (OR 3.875, CI 1.964-7.648, P < .001) but not in patients with a hard palate fistula (OR 1.140, CI 0.497-2.613, P = .757). Veau class, age at primary repair, and syndromic status were not significant predictors of VPI (0.128≤P ≤ .975).

CONCLUSIONS:

A palatal fistula involving the soft palate is a significant predictor for development of velopharyngeal dysfunction after primary palatoplasty. Surgical intervention, at the time of fistula repair, to add vascularized tissue may be indicated to prophylactically decrease the risk of velopharyngeal dysfunction.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Insuficiencia Velofaríngea / Fisura del Paladar / Fístula Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Cleft Palate Craniofac J Asunto de la revista: ODONTOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Insuficiencia Velofaríngea / Fisura del Paladar / Fístula Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Cleft Palate Craniofac J Asunto de la revista: ODONTOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos