Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Outcomes 12 Months After Temperature-Controlled Radiofrequency Device Treatment of the Nasal Valve for Patients With Nasal Airway Obstruction.
Han, Joseph K; Silvers, Stacey L; Rosenthal, Jon N; McDuffie, Chad M; Yen, David M.
Afiliación
  • Han JK; Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk.
  • Silvers SL; Madison ENT & Facial Plastic Surgery, New York, New York.
  • Rosenthal JN; ENT and Allergy Associates of Florida, Coral Springs.
  • McDuffie CM; ENT Associates of Texas, McKinney.
  • Yen DM; Specialty Physician Associates, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania.
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 148(10): 940-946, 2022 10 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36048465
ABSTRACT
Importance Nasal valve collapse is a primary cause of nasal airway obstruction (NAO). Patients with NAO and nasal valve collapse experience a variety of symptoms that lower their quality of life, such as nasal congestion, headache, sleep disturbance, daytime sleepiness, and snoring.

Objective:

To determine if active treatment of the nasal valve with a temperature-controlled radiofrequency (TCRF) device, previously demonstrated superior to a sham procedure at 3 months, was safe and associated with sustained improvements in symptoms of NAO through 12 months. Design, Setting, and

Participants:

In a prospective, multicenter, single-blinded, randomized clinical trial, patients in 16 centers in the US with index procedures between August and December 2020 were assigned to TCRF device treatment of the nasal valve or a sham control procedure (no RF energy). Patients had a baseline Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) Scale score of 55 or greater with nasal valve collapse as the primary or substantial contributor to NAO. After primary end point evaluation at 3 months, eligible patients in the sham control arm crossed over to active treatment. Data analysis was performed between April and May 2022.

Interventions:

Patients were treated bilaterally with the TCRF device at 4 or fewer nonoverlapping areas on the nasal mucosa at the junction of the upper and lower lateral cartilage on the lateral nasal wall. Main Outcomes and

Measures:

The primary end point measure was responder rate, defined as 20% or greater reduction in NOSE Scale score or 1 or greater reduction in NOSE Scale clinical severity category.

Results:

A total of 108 patients received active treatment (77 as index active treatment, 31 after crossover). The mean (SD) age of patients was 48.5 (12.3) years; 66 (61.1%) were women. The combined group of patients receiving active treatment had a mean baseline NOSE Scale score of 76.3 (95% CI, 73.6-79.1). At 12 months (n = 88), the responder rate was 89.8% (95% CI, 81.7%-94.5%). The NOSE Scale score improved from baseline (mean change, -44.9 [95% CI, -52.1 to -37.7]). No device/procedure-related serious adverse events were reported. Conclusions and Relevance In this follow-up of a cohort from a randomized clinical trial, the minimally invasive TCRF device, previously demonstrated to be superior to a sham procedure, was safe and associated with improvement in symptoms of NAO through 12 months postprocedure. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT04549545.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Obstrucción Nasal Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Obstrucción Nasal Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article