Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
How does patient-centered communication in ovarian cancer care enhance patient well-being? A mixed methods study.
Pozzar, Rachel A; Xiong, Niya; Hong, Fangxin; Wright, Alexi A; Goff, Barbara A; Underhill-Blazey, Meghan L; Tulsky, James A; Hammer, Marilyn J; Berry, Donna L.
Afiliación
  • Pozzar RA; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: rachel_pozzar@dfci.harvard.edu.
  • Xiong N; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Hong F; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Wright AA; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Goff BA; University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
  • Underhill-Blazey ML; University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
  • Tulsky JA; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Hammer MJ; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Berry DL; University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Gynecol Oncol ; 167(2): 261-268, 2022 11.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36057465
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Greater perceived patient-centered communication (PCC) is associated with better health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with ovarian cancer. Quantitative measures of PCC and HRQoL do little to explain this association. We interviewed patients with high and low ratings of PCC to understand how it is associated with HRQoL.

METHODS:

Explanatory sequential mixed methods study. Participants were English-speaking U.S. adults with ovarian cancer. We assessed PCC with the Patient-Centered Communication - Cancer (PCC-Ca)-36 (possible score range 1-5; higher scores represent greater patient-centeredness), and purposively sampled 14 participants with total scores in the top and bottom quartiles. Participants completed individual, semi-structured interviews about their communication experiences. Guided by the National Cancer Institute Framework for PCC in Cancer Care, we analyzed interview transcripts using directed content analysis. We integrated survey and interview findings in a joint display.

RESULTS:

Among 176 survey respondents, PCC-Ca-36 total scores ranged from 1.7 to 5.0. Participants with scores in the top quartile (4.8-5.0) perceived clinicians as proactive and attentive to psychosocial concerns. Those with scores in the bottom quartile (1.7-3.5) described not feeling known as an individual and receiving limited support for self-management.

CONCLUSIONS:

The association between PCC and QoL may be partially explained by differences in perceived support for psychosocial concerns and self-management. PCC may facilitate receipt of proactive, personalized care.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Ováricas / Calidad de Vida Tipo de estudio: Qualitative_research Límite: Adult / Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Gynecol Oncol Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Ováricas / Calidad de Vida Tipo de estudio: Qualitative_research Límite: Adult / Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Gynecol Oncol Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article