Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Why a clinical trial is as good as its outcome measure: A framework for the selection and use of cognitive outcome measures for clinical trials of Alzheimer's disease.
Jutten, Roos J; Papp, Kathryn V; Hendrix, Suzanne; Ellison, Noel; Langbaum, Jessica B; Donohue, Michael C; Hassenstab, Jason; Maruff, Paul; Rentz, Dorene M; Harrison, John; Cummings, Jeffrey; Scheltens, Philip; Sikkes, Sietske A M.
Afiliación
  • Jutten RJ; Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Papp KV; Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Hendrix S; Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Ellison N; Pentara Corporation, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
  • Langbaum JB; Pentara Corporation, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
  • Donohue MC; Banner Alzheimer's Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
  • Hassenstab J; Alzheimer's Therapeutic Research Institute, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, San Diego, California, USA.
  • Maruff P; Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Center, Department of Neurology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
  • Rentz DM; Cogstate Ltd., Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Harrison J; The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Cummings J; Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Scheltens P; Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Sikkes SAM; Metis Cognition Ltd., Kilmington, UK.
Alzheimers Dement ; 19(2): 708-720, 2023 02.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36086926
ABSTRACT
A crucial aspect of any clinical trial is using the right outcome measure to assess treatment efficacy. Compared to the rapidly evolved understanding and measurement of pathophysiology in preclinical and early symptomatic stages of Alzheimer's disease (AD), relatively less progress has been made in the evolution of clinical outcome assessments (COAs) for those stages. The current paper aims to provide a benchmark for the design and evaluation of COAs for use in early AD trials. We discuss lessons learned on capturing cognitive changes in predementia stages of AD, including challenges when validating novel COAs for those early stages and necessary evidence for their implementation in clinical trials. Moving forward, we propose a multi-step framework to advance the use of more effective COAs to assess clinically meaningful changes in early AD, which will hopefully contribute to the much-needed consensus around more appropriate outcome measures to assess clinical efficacy of putative treatments. HIGHLIGHTS We discuss lessons learned on capturing cognitive changes in predementia stages of AD. We propose a framework for the design and evaluation of performance based cognitive tests for use in early AD trials. We provide recommendations to facilitate the implementation of more effective cognitive outcome measures in AD trials.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Enfermedad de Alzheimer Tipo de estudio: Guideline Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Alzheimers Dement Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Enfermedad de Alzheimer Tipo de estudio: Guideline Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Alzheimers Dement Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos