Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Endoprosthetic replacement of the proximal tibia for oncological conditions.
Sacchetti, Federico; Aston, Will; Pollock, Rob; Gikas, Panos; Cuomo, Pierluigi; Gerrand, Craig.
Afiliación
  • Sacchetti F; Divisione di Ortopedia Oncologica e Ricostruttiva, Careggi University Hospital (Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi), Florence, Italy.
  • Aston W; Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK.
  • Pollock R; Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK.
  • Gikas P; Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK.
  • Cuomo P; Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, UK.
  • Gerrand C; Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK.
Bone Jt Open ; 3(9): 733-740, 2022 Sep.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36129463
ABSTRACT

AIMS:

The proximal tibia (PT) is the anatomical site most frequently affected by primary bone tumours after the distal femur. Reconstruction of the PT remains challenging because of the poor soft-tissue cover and the need to reconstruct the extensor mechanism. Reconstructive techniques include implantation of massive endoprosthesis (megaprosthesis), osteoarticular allografts (OAs), or allograft-prosthesis composites (APCs).

METHODS:

This was a retrospective analysis of clinical data relating to patients who underwent proximal tibial arthroplasty in our regional bone tumour centre from 2010 to 2018.

RESULTS:

A total of 76 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included in the study. Mean age at surgery was 43.2 years (12 to 86 (SD 21)). The mean follow-up period was 60.1 months (5.4 to 353). In total 21 failures were identified, giving an overall failure rate of 27.6%. Prosthesis survival at five years was 75.5%, and at ten years was 59%. At last follow-up, mean knee flexion was 89.8° (SD 36°) with a mean extensor lag of 18.1° (SD 24°). In univariate analysis, factors associated with better survival of the prosthesis were a malignant or metastatic cancer diagnosis (versus benign), with a five- and ten-year survival of 78.9% and 65.7% versus 37.5% (p = 0.045), while in-hospital length of stay longer than nine days was also associated with better prognosis with five- and ten-year survival rates at 84% and 84% versus 60% and 16% (p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, only in-hospital length of stay was associated with longer survival (hazard ratio (HR) 0.23, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.08 to 0.66).

CONCLUSION:

We have shown that proximal tibial arthroplasty with endoprosthesis is a safe and reliable method for reconstruction in patients treated for orthopaedic oncological conditions. Either modular or custom implants in this series performed well.Cite this article Bone Jt Open 2022;3(9)733-740.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Bone Jt Open Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Italia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Bone Jt Open Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Italia