Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Can ankle proprioception be improved by repeated exposure to an ankle movement discrimination task requiring step-landing in individuals with and without CAI?
Yu, Ruoni; Yang, Zonghan; Witchalls, Jeremy; Adams, Roger; Waddington, Gordon; Han, Jia.
Afiliación
  • Yu R; School of Medicine, Jinhua Polytechnic, Jinhua, China.
  • Yang Z; Faculty of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Witchalls J; Research Institute for Sport and Exercise, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australia.
  • Adams R; Research Institute for Sport and Exercise, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australia.
  • Waddington G; Research Institute for Sport and Exercise, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australia.
  • Han J; College of Rehabilitation Sciences, Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Shanghai, China; School of Exercise and Health, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai, China; Faculty of Health, Arts and Design, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, VIC, Australia. Electronic address
Phys Ther Sport ; 58: 68-73, 2022 Nov.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36223690
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether individuals with and without Chronic Ankle Instability (CAI) can improve their ankle movement discrimination sensitivity by repeated exposure to an ankle proprioceptive task requiring landing. DESIGN: A repeated-measures study. SETTING: University laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: 24 university students, 11 with CAI and 13 without CAI. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Ankle proprioception was measured using the Ankle Inversion Discrimination Apparatus for Landing (AIDAL) over 3 occasions: AIDAL-1 and AIDAL-2 separated with a 10-min interval, and AIDAL-3 at 24 h post AIDAL-2. RESULTS: Better Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT) questionnaire scores were correlated with higher AIDAL scores (rho = 0.465, p = 0.022). Two-way ANOVA showed a significant CAI main effect for step landing ankle inversion proprioception, with CAI worse (F = 8.410, p = 0.008), but the Time main effect across the 3 AIDAL tests was not significant (F = 1.552, p = 0.223). CONCLUSIONS: The AIDAL assessment was sensitive in terms of discriminating between individuals with or without CAI. However, the step-down component of the AIDAL proprioceptive task was possibly too challenging. For CAI, physical therapy exercises should take into account the difficulty of the training task, so that a demonstrable learning effect can be achieved.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Traumatismos del Tobillo / Inestabilidad de la Articulación Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Phys Ther Sport Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA ESPORTIVA / MEDICINA FISICA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Traumatismos del Tobillo / Inestabilidad de la Articulación Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Phys Ther Sport Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA ESPORTIVA / MEDICINA FISICA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China