Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
[Adhesion of urologists to the recommendations of the French Urological Association Cancer Committee (CCAFU) in the imaging work-up of localized prostate cancer]. / L'adhésion des urologues aux recommandations du comité de cancérologie de l'association Française d'urologie (CCAFU) dans le bilan d'imagerie du cancer localisé de la prostate.
Trétarre, B; Trouche-Sabatier, S-G; Foucan, A-S; Abdo, N; Poinas, G; Rébillard, X; Azria, D; Iborra, F.
Afiliación
  • Trétarre B; Registre des tumeurs de l'Hérault, 208 rue des apothicaires, 34298 Montpellier cedex 5, France; CERPOP, université de Toulouse, Inserm, UPS, Toulouse, France. Electronic address: tretarre.brigitte@registre-tumeurs-herault.fr.
  • Trouche-Sabatier SG; Registre des tumeurs de l'Hérault, 208 rue des apothicaires, 34298 Montpellier cedex 5, France.
  • Foucan AS; Registre des tumeurs de l'Hérault, 208 rue des apothicaires, 34298 Montpellier cedex 5, France.
  • Abdo N; CHU Lapeyronie, Montpellier, France.
  • Poinas G; Clinique Beau Soleil, Montpellier, France.
  • Rébillard X; Clinique Beau Soleil, Montpellier, France.
  • Azria D; Inserm U 1194, ICM, université Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
  • Iborra F; Registre des tumeurs de l'Hérault, 208 rue des apothicaires, 34298 Montpellier cedex 5, France; CHU Lapeyronie, Montpellier, France.
Prog Urol ; 32(16): 1446-1454, 2022 Dec.
Article en Fr | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36344379
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

The literature review shows a low adhesion of urologists to the recommendations of learned societies in the imaging work-up of localized prostate cancer (CaP), especially for low and intermediate risks of the D'Amico classification. We analyzed the adhesion of urologists in the Hérault region (France) to the CCAFU 2016/2018, 2018/2020 recommendations. MATERIAL AND

METHODS:

From the Hérault Onco Urology Registry (RHESOU) database, we identified localized CaP diagnosed between 01/01/2017 and 31/12/2019, and then classified them into 3 distinct risk groups according to the D'Amico classification. We compared the imaging workup performed by each patient to the CCAFU 2016/2018, 2018/2020 recommendations, according to the risk group.

RESULTS:

Of the 2,049 localized CaPs included in our study, 591 belonged to the low-risk group, 1059 to the intermediate-risk group, and 399 to the high-risk group. In the low-risk group 45.2% of the cases did not follow the CCAFU 2016/2018, 2018/2020 recommendations in the imaging workup, 77.3% in the intermediate-risk group and 80.9% in the high-risk group. For our entire study, 1,408 patients (68.7%) had an imaging workup that did not follow the CCAFU recommendations.

CONCLUSION:

Our results show a low adhesion of urologists to the CCAFU recommendations in the imaging assessment of localized CaP. The causes of this non-adhesion are multifactorial and difficult to analyze.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Próstata / Urología / Neoplasias Urológicas Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans / Male País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: Fr Revista: Prog Urol Asunto de la revista: UROLOGIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Próstata / Urología / Neoplasias Urológicas Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans / Male País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: Fr Revista: Prog Urol Asunto de la revista: UROLOGIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article