Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of current methods for anti-dsDNA antibody detection and reshaping diagnostic strategies.
Infantino, Maria; Palterer, Boaz; Previtali, Giulia; Alessio, Maria-Grazia; Villalta, Danilo; Carbone, Teresa; Platzgummer, Stefan; Paura, Giusi; Castiglione, Caterina; Fabris, Martina; Pesce, Giampaola; Porcelli, Brunetta; Terzuoli, Lucia; Bacarelli, Maria-Romana; Tampoia, Marilina; Cinquanta, Luigi; Brusca, Ignazio; Buzzolini, Francesca; Benucci, Maurizio; Tortora, Matteo; Tronchin, Lorenzo; Guarrasi, Valerio; Soda, Paolo; Manfredi, Mariangela; Bizzaro, Nicola.
Afiliación
  • Infantino M; Laboratorio di Immunologia e Allergologia, Ospedale S. Giovanni di Dio, Florence, Italy.
  • Palterer B; Dipartimento di Medicina Sperimentale e Clinica, Università degli studi di Firenze, Florence, Italy.
  • Previtali G; Laboratorio Analisi Chimico Cliniche, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy.
  • Alessio MG; Laboratorio Analisi Chimico Cliniche, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy.
  • Villalta D; SSD di Allergologia e Immunologia Clinica, Presidio Ospedaliero S. Maria degli Angeli, Pordenone, Italy.
  • Carbone T; UOC Patologia Clinica Microbiologia e Medicina di Laboratorio, Azienda Sanitaria Locale di Matera (ASM), Matera, Italy.
  • Platzgummer S; Laboratorio Centrale, Ospedale Civile, Merano, Italy.
  • Paura G; Laboratorio Analisi, Ospedale Civile, Voghera, Italy.
  • Castiglione C; Laboratorio di Immunologia, Ospedale Spirito Santo, Pescara, Italy.
  • Fabris M; SOC Istituto di Patologia Clinica, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata, Udine, Italy.
  • Pesce G; Laboratorio Diagnostico di Autoimmunologia, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.
  • Porcelli B; Dipartimento di Medicina Interna e Specialità Mediche (DIMI), Università di Genova, Genoa, Italy.
  • Terzuoli L; UOC Laboratorio Patologia Clinica, Policlinico S. Maria alle Scotte, AOU Senese, Siena, Italy.
  • Bacarelli MR; Dipartimento Biotecnologie Mediche, Università degli Studi di Siena, Siena, Italy.
  • Tampoia M; UOC Laboratorio Patologia Clinica, Policlinico S. Maria alle Scotte, AOU Senese, Siena, Italy.
  • Cinquanta L; Dipartimento Biotecnologie Mediche, Università degli Studi di Siena, Siena, Italy.
  • Brusca I; UOC Laboratorio Patologia Clinica, Policlinico S. Maria alle Scotte, AOU Senese, Siena, Italy.
  • Buzzolini F; Dipartimento Scienze Mediche Chirurgiche e Neuroscienze, Università degli Studi di Siena, Siena, Italy.
  • Benucci M; Patologia Clinica, Microbiologia e Genetica Medica, ASL TA, Taranto, Italy.
  • Tortora M; IRCCS S.D.N., Naples, Italy.
  • Tronchin L; Patologia Clinica, Ospedale Buccheri La Ferla FBF, Palermo, Italy.
  • Guarrasi V; SSD di Allergologia e Immunologia Clinica, Presidio Ospedaliero S. Maria degli Angeli, Pordenone, Italy.
  • Soda P; Patologia Clinica, Ospedale Buccheri La Ferla FBF, Palermo, Italy.
  • Manfredi M; Reumatologia, Ospedale S. Giovanni di Dio, Florence, Italy.
  • Bizzaro N; Unità di Sistemi di elaborazione e bioinformatica, Facoltà dipartimentale di Ingegneria, Università Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy.
Scand J Immunol ; 96(6): e13220, 2022 Dec.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36373656
ABSTRACT
Anti-double-stranded DNA antibodies (anti-dsDNA) are considered a specific marker for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Though the Farr technique was once the reference method for their detection, it has been almost entirely replaced by more recently developed assays. However, there is still no solid evidence of the commutability of these methods in terms of diagnostic accuracy and their correlation with the Crithidia luciliae immunofluorescence test (CLIFT). Anti-dsDNA antibody levels were measured in 80

subjects:

24 patients with SLE, 36 disease controls drawn from different autoimmune rheumatic diseases (14 systemic sclerosis, 10 Sjögren's syndrome, nine autoimmune myositis, three mixed connective tissue disease), 10 inflammatory arthritis and 10 apparently healthy blood donors by eight different

methods:

fluorescence enzyme immunoassay, microdot array, chemiluminescent immunoassay (two assays), multiplex flow immunoassay, particle multi-analyte technology immunoassay and two CLIFT. At the recommended manufacturer cut-off, the sensitivity varied from 67% to 92%, while the specificity ranged from 84% to 98%. Positive agreement among CLIFT and the other assays was higher than negative agreement. Mean agreement among methods assessed by the Cohen's kappa was 0.715, ranging from moderate (0.588) to almost perfect (0.888). Evaluation of the concordance among quantitative values by regression analysis showed a poor correlation index (mean r2, 0.66). The present study shows that current technologies for anti-dsDNA antibody detection are not fully comparable. In particular, their different correlation with CLIFT influences their positioning in the diagnostic algorithm for SLE (either in association or sequentially). Considering the high intermethod variability, harmonization and commutability of anti-dsDNA antibody testing remains an unachieved goal.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Enfermedades Autoinmunes / Síndrome de Sjögren / Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Scand J Immunol Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Italia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Enfermedades Autoinmunes / Síndrome de Sjögren / Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Scand J Immunol Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Italia