Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Accuracy of newer generation intraocular lens power calculation formulas in pediatric cataract patients.
Lin, Lei; Fang, Jiayan; Sun, Weijie; Gu, Siyi; Xu, Liming; Chen, Siping; Chang, Pingjun; Zhao, Yun-E.
Afiliación
  • Lin L; Eye Hospital and School of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, 325102, China.
  • Fang J; National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China.
  • Sun W; Eye Hospital and School of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, 325102, China.
  • Gu S; National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China.
  • Xu L; Eye Hospital and School of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, 325102, China.
  • Chen S; National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China.
  • Chang P; Eye Hospital and School of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, 325102, China.
  • Zhao YE; National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol ; 261(4): 1019-1027, 2023 Apr.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36385570
PURPOSE: To evaluate the accuracy of newer generation intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas (EVO 2.0 and Kane) with established formulas (Barrett Universal II, Haigis and SRK/T) in pediatric cataract patients. METHODS: Retrospective study. We enrolled 110 eyes (110 patients) in Eye Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University. All patients underwent uneventful cataract surgery and implanted with posterior chamber IOL in the bag. We calculate the mean prediction errors (PE) and percentage within 1 diopter (D) at 1 month to assess the accuracy, and percentage > 2D was defined as prediction accident. Then, we performed subgroup analysis according to age and axial length (AL). RESULTS: The mean age and AL were 37.45 ± 23.28 months and 21.16 ± 1.29 mm. The mean PE for all patients was as follows: Barrett (- 0.30), EVO (0.18), Haigis (- 0.74), Kane (- 0.36), and SRK/T (0.58), p < 0.001. In addition, EVO and SRK/T formulas were relatively accurate in patients younger than 24 months and with AL ≤ 21 mm, while EVO got lower prediction accident rate than SRK/T (3/41 vs 8/41, 4/52 vs 5/52). Moreover, Barrett, EVO, and Kane formulas achieved better accuracy and lower prediction accident rate in patients older than 24 months and with AL > 21 mm (both > 51/69 and 43/58, and < 3/69 and 3/58). CONCLUSIONS: In patients older than 24 months and with AL > 21 mm, Barrett, EVO, and Kane formulas were relatively accurate, while in patients younger than 24 months and with AL ≤ 21 mm, EVO was more accurate, followed by SRK/T formula.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Catarata / Facoemulsificación / Lentes Intraoculares Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Child / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Catarata / Facoemulsificación / Lentes Intraoculares Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Child / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China