Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mitosis domain generalization in histopathology images - The MIDOG challenge.
Aubreville, Marc; Stathonikos, Nikolas; Bertram, Christof A; Klopfleisch, Robert; Ter Hoeve, Natalie; Ciompi, Francesco; Wilm, Frauke; Marzahl, Christian; Donovan, Taryn A; Maier, Andreas; Breen, Jack; Ravikumar, Nishant; Chung, Youjin; Park, Jinah; Nateghi, Ramin; Pourakpour, Fattaneh; Fick, Rutger H J; Ben Hadj, Saima; Jahanifar, Mostafa; Shephard, Adam; Dexl, Jakob; Wittenberg, Thomas; Kondo, Satoshi; Lafarge, Maxime W; Koelzer, Viktor H; Liang, Jingtang; Wang, Yubo; Long, Xi; Liu, Jingxin; Razavi, Salar; Khademi, April; Yang, Sen; Wang, Xiyue; Erber, Ramona; Klang, Andrea; Lipnik, Karoline; Bolfa, Pompei; Dark, Michael J; Wasinger, Gabriel; Veta, Mitko; Breininger, Katharina.
Afiliación
  • Aubreville M; Technische Hochschule Ingolstadt, Ingolstadt, Germany. Electronic address: marc.aubreville@thi.de.
  • Stathonikos N; Pathology Department, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Bertram CA; Institute of Pathology, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Austria.
  • Klopfleisch R; Institute of Veterinary Pathology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
  • Ter Hoeve N; Pathology Department, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Ciompi F; Computational Pathology Group, Radboud UMC, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Wilm F; Pattern Recognition Lab, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany; Department Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Engineering, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
  • Marzahl C; Pattern Recognition Lab, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
  • Donovan TA; Department of Anatomic Pathology, Schwarzman Animal Medical Center, NY, USA.
  • Maier A; Pattern Recognition Lab, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
  • Breen J; CISTIB Center for Computational Imaging and Simulation Technologies in Biomedicine, School of Computing, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
  • Ravikumar N; CISTIB Center for Computational Imaging and Simulation Technologies in Biomedicine, School of Computing, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
  • Chung Y; Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, South Korea.
  • Park J; Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, South Korea.
  • Nateghi R; Electrical and Electronics Engineering Department, Shiraz University of Technology, Shiraz, Iran.
  • Pourakpour F; Iranian Brain Mapping Biobank (IBMB), National Brain Mapping Laboratory (NBML), Tehran, Iran.
  • Fick RHJ; Tribun Health, Paris, France.
  • Ben Hadj S; Tribun Health, Paris, France.
  • Jahanifar M; Tissue Image Analytics Centre, Department of Computer Science, University of Warwick, Warwick, UK.
  • Shephard A; Tissue Image Analytics Centre, Department of Computer Science, University of Warwick, Warwick, UK.
  • Dexl J; Fraunhofer-Institute for Integrated Circuits IIS, Erlangen, Germany.
  • Wittenberg T; Fraunhofer-Institute for Integrated Circuits IIS, Erlangen, Germany.
  • Kondo S; Muroran Institute of Technology, Hokkaido, Japan.
  • Lafarge MW; Department of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Koelzer VH; Department of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Liang J; School of Life Science and Technology, Xidian University, Shannxi, China.
  • Wang Y; School of Life Science and Technology, Xidian University, Shannxi, China.
  • Long X; Histo Pathology Diagnostic Center, Shanghai, China.
  • Liu J; Xi'an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, Suzhou, China.
  • Razavi S; Image Analysis in Medicine Lab (IAMLAB), Electrical, Computer and Biomedical Engineering, Ryerson University, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Khademi A; Image Analysis in Medicine Lab (IAMLAB), Electrical, Computer and Biomedical Engineering, Ryerson University, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Yang S; Tencent AI Lab, Shenzhen 518057, China.
  • Wang X; College of Computer Science, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China.
  • Erber R; Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
  • Klang A; Institute of Pathology, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Austria.
  • Lipnik K; Institute of Pathology, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Austria.
  • Bolfa P; Ross University School of Veterinary Medicine, Basseterre, Saint Kitts and Nevis.
  • Dark MJ; College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
  • Wasinger G; Department of Pathology, General Hospital of Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Veta M; Medical Image Analysis Group, TU Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
  • Breininger K; Department Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Engineering, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Med Image Anal ; 84: 102699, 2023 02.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36463832
ABSTRACT
The density of mitotic figures (MF) within tumor tissue is known to be highly correlated with tumor proliferation and thus is an important marker in tumor grading. Recognition of MF by pathologists is subject to a strong inter-rater bias, limiting its prognostic value. State-of-the-art deep learning methods can support experts but have been observed to strongly deteriorate when applied in a different clinical environment. The variability caused by using different whole slide scanners has been identified as one decisive component in the underlying domain shift. The goal of the MICCAI MIDOG 2021 challenge was the creation of scanner-agnostic MF detection algorithms. The challenge used a training set of 200 cases, split across four scanning systems. As test set, an additional 100 cases split across four scanning systems, including two previously unseen scanners, were provided. In this paper, we evaluate and compare the approaches that were submitted to the challenge and identify methodological factors contributing to better performance. The winning algorithm yielded an F1 score of 0.748 (CI95 0.704-0.781), exceeding the performance of six experts on the same task.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Algoritmos / Mitosis Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Med Image Anal Asunto de la revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Algoritmos / Mitosis Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Med Image Anal Asunto de la revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article