Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Validation of a novel computerized cognitive function test for the rapid detection of mild cognitive impairment.
Kouzuki, Minoru; Miyamoto, Madoka; Tanaka, Nobuto; Urakami, Katsuya.
Afiliación
  • Kouzuki M; Department of Biological Regulation, School of Health Science, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, 86 Nishi-cho, Yonago, 683-8503, Japan. kouzuki@tottori-u.ac.jp.
  • Miyamoto M; Department of Dementia Prevention, School of Health Science, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, 86 Nishi-cho, Yonago, 683-8503, Japan.
  • Tanaka N; Department of Dementia Prevention, School of Health Science, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, 86 Nishi-cho, Yonago, 683-8503, Japan.
  • Urakami K; Department of Dementia Prevention, School of Health Science, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, 86 Nishi-cho, Yonago, 683-8503, Japan.
BMC Neurol ; 22(1): 457, 2022 Dec 07.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36476188
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

In the present study, we examined the distinguishing ability of a mild cognitive impairment (MCI) assessment tool for rapid screening using a computer (MARC) for Alzheimer's disease dementia (ADD), MCI, and non-demented controls (NDC) with no cognitive impairment, as well as its validity and reliability, as part of a preliminary trial for the development of the tool.

METHODS:

A total of 64 participants (23 in the ADD group, 17 in the MCI group, and 24 in the NDC group) were analyzed. The participants were administered MARC and a pre-existing computerized Alzheimer's dementia screening test (MSP), and 31 participants (14 in the MCI group, 17 in the NDC group) were readministered MARC within 4 months from the first test.

RESULTS:

The median (interquartile range) test time for MARC was 401 (350-453) s. Total MARC scores were significantly worse in the MCI and ADD groups than in the NDC group (p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively). In the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, the area under the ROC curve (AUC) when comparing the NDC and MCI groups was 0.866 (95% CI, 0.759-0.974), when comparing the NDC and AD groups was 0.989 (95% CI, 0.970-1.000), and when comparing the MCI and AD groups was 0.889 (95% CI, 0.790-0.988). Furthermore, there was a significant correlation with the results of the existing test, MSP (r = 0.839, p < 0.001). In addition, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) (1,1) when the first and second MARC scores were compared was 0.740 (95% CI, 0.529-0.865; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS:

MARC is considered capable of distinguishing MCI with high accuracy. The tool has good validity and reliability, and it can be administered in a short period of time without the need for a specialist.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Demencia / Disfunción Cognitiva Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Neurol Asunto de la revista: NEUROLOGIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Japón

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Demencia / Disfunción Cognitiva Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Neurol Asunto de la revista: NEUROLOGIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Japón