Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Could PD-L1 positivity be associated with venous thrombosis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer?
Söyler, Yasemin; Akin Kabalak, Pinar; Kavurgaci, Suna; Akyürek, Nalan; Demirag, Funda; Yilmaz, Ülkü.
Afiliación
  • Söyler Y; Department of Chest Diseases, Ankara Ataturk Sanatorium Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey. dryaseminsoyler@gmail.com.
  • Akin Kabalak P; Department of Chest Diseases, Ankara Ataturk Sanatorium Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Kavurgaci S; Department of Chest Diseases, Ankara Ataturk Sanatorium Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Akyürek N; Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Demirag F; Department of Pathology, Ankara Ataturk Sanatorium Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Yilmaz Ü; Department of Chest Diseases, Ankara Ataturk Sanatorium Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
J Thromb Thrombolysis ; 55(2): 382-391, 2023 Feb.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36564589
ABSTRACT
The risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is increased in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and defining at-risk patients is important. Thus, we aimed to assess the association between programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and VTE [pulmonary embolism (PE), deep venous thrombosis (DVT)] in NSCLC. In this retrospective, observational multicentre study, 369 patients with NSCLC who had PD-L1 immunohistochemistry based on biopsies taken between January 2017 and December 2019, were divided as PD-L1-positive (n = 181) and -negative (n = 188) groups, and low-positive (n = 99) and high-positive (n = 82) PD-L1 groups. Among all population, 12.5% of them developed a VTE during a median follow-up of 474 days. The rates of DVT, PE, and PE + DVT were 5.7%, 6% and 0.8%, respectively. VTE (15.5% vs. 9.5%) and DVT (3.8% vs. 7.4%) were similar between two groups, while PE was significantly higher in PD­L1-positive group than those in PD-L1-negative group (11.1% vs 1%, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between low- and high-positive groups in terms of VTE (14.1% vs. 17%), PE (12.1% vs. 9.8%), and DVT (2% vs. 6.1%). In the multivariate analysis, multiple metastases (Hazard ratio [HR] 4.02; 95% confidence interval [Cl] 1.18-13.63; p = 0.07) and PD-L1 positivity was associated with an increased PE risk (HR 8.39; 95% Cl 2.07-34.07; p = 0.003). In conclusion, PD-L1 positivity may be of important role in predicting the increased risk of PE in patients with NSCLC and thereby may be used to define patients likely to benefit from thromboprophylaxis.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Embolia Pulmonar / Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas / Trombosis de la Vena / Tromboembolia Venosa / Neoplasias Pulmonares Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Thromb Thrombolysis Asunto de la revista: ANGIOLOGIA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Turquía

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Embolia Pulmonar / Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas / Trombosis de la Vena / Tromboembolia Venosa / Neoplasias Pulmonares Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Thromb Thrombolysis Asunto de la revista: ANGIOLOGIA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Turquía