Resection versus biopsy for management of primary central nervous system lymphoma: a meta-analysis.

ABSTRACT

The role of surgery in the management of primary central nervous system lymphomas (PCNSL) is currently confined to diagnosis. However, over recent years, an increasing number of papers have suggested a possible positive prognostic impact of surgery in selected cases. The present work aims to perform a meta-analysis of the available literature evidence. A meta-analysis with meta-regression on the role of surgical resection compared to biopsy in the management of PCNSL was conducted according to the PRISMA statement, searching MEDLINE via PubMed and Embase. The random effect model was used. The quality of evidence was assessed using the GRADE framework. After screening 1395 records, we included 11 papers in our analysis. Patients who underwent surgical resection harbored superficial and single-lesion tumors. At 1-, 2-, and 5-year follow-up, progression-free survival did not differ between the two groups, while overall survival favored resection, even if in a non-significant fashion. Meta-regression analysis showed that the overall survival rate at 2 years, but not at 1 or 5 years, was significantly influenced by tumor location. There were no differences in terms of age, sex, Karnofsky performance status, adjuvant therapy, or procedure-related complications. Overall, the quality of evidence is low. The results of the present meta-analysis do not change the current standard of care for PCNSL. However, surgery could be non-inferior to biopsy with an acceptable risk profile in selected patients harboring single and superficial lesions. The low quality of evidence prompts future randomized studies.