Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact of sternal fixation on patient outcomes: A case matched review.
Bauman, Zachary M; Todd, Sydney J; Raposo-Hadley, Ashley; Binkley, Jana; King, Tylor; Cahoy, Kevin; Kamien, Andrew; Cemaj, Samuel; Berning, Bennett; Evans, Charity H; Cantrell, Emily.
Afiliación
  • Bauman ZM; From the Division of Trauma, Emergency General Surgery and Critical Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg ; 94(4): 573-577, 2023 04 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36730841
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Sternal fractures are debilitating injuries often resulting in severe pain and respiratory compromise. Surgical fixation of sternal fractures is gaining popularity as a treatment modality for sternal fractures. Unfortunately, little literature exists on this topic. This study looks to further examine the benefits of sternal fixation (SF), hypothesizing SF results in improved pain, improved respiratory function, and decreased opioid use.

METHODS:

Retrospective review was performed between patients with sternal fractures who underwent nonoperative management (NOM) versus operative SF. Case matching was used to construct an artificial control group matched on age and Injury Severity Score using a 11 ratio of treatment to control. Exclusion criteria were age younger than 18 years. Outcomes of interest included mean pain score, total opioid requirements (in morphine milliequivalents) within 24 hours of discharge, intensive care unit and hospital length of stay (LOS), and incentive spirometry percent predicted value at discharge. Dependent variables were analyzed using t test, and Injury Severity Score was analyzed using the sign test. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

RESULTS:

Fifty-eight patients from the SF cohort were matched with 58 patients from the NOM cohort. The average age was 59.8 years for the SF group and 62.2 years for the NOM group. Injury Severity Score was matched at 9 for both cohorts. Although pain scores were similar for both cohorts, the SF group required significantly less opioids at discharge (62.1 vs. 92.2 morphine milliequivalents; p = 0.007). In addition, the SF cohort demonstrated significantly improved respiratory function per incentive spirometry percent predicted value at discharge (75.5% vs. 59.9%; p < 0.001). Intensive care unit LOS and hospital LOS were similar between cohorts.

CONCLUSION:

Despite similarities in pain scores, intensive care unit LOS, and hospital LOS, SF was associated with decreased opioid requirements and improved respiratory function at discharge in this study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic/Care Management; Level IV.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Fracturas Óseas / Analgésicos Opioides Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Fracturas Óseas / Analgésicos Opioides Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article