Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Variation in adult living donor liver transplantation in the United States: Identifying opportunities for increased utilization.
Lentine, Krista L; Tanaka, Tomohiro; Xiao, Huiling; Bittermann, Therese; Dew, Mary Amanda; Schnitzler, Mark A; Olthoff, Kim M; Locke, Jayme E; Emre, Sukru; Hunt, Heather F; Liapakis, AnnMarie; Axelrod, David A.
Afiliación
  • Lentine KL; Saint Louis University Transplant Center, SSM-Saint Louis University Hospital, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
  • Tanaka T; Organ Transplant Center, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
  • Xiao H; Saint Louis University Transplant Center, SSM-Saint Louis University Hospital, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
  • Bittermann T; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Dew MA; University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Schnitzler MA; Saint Louis University Transplant Center, SSM-Saint Louis University Hospital, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
  • Olthoff KM; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Locke JE; University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
  • Emre S; Ege University School of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey.
  • Hunt HF; United Network for Organ Sharing, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
  • Liapakis A; Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
  • Axelrod DA; Organ Transplant Center, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Clin Transplant ; 37(7): e14924, 2023 07.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36733213
ABSTRACT
In the United States, living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is limited to transplant centers with specific experience. However, the impact of recipient characteristics on procedure selection (LDLT vs. deceased donor liver transplant [DDLT]) within these centers has not been described. Transplant registry data for centers that performed ≥1 LDLT in 2002-2019 were analyzed using hierarchal regression modeling to quantify the impact of patient and center factors on the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of LDLT (vs DDLT). Among 73,681 adult recipients, only 4% underwent LDLT, varying from <1% to >60% of total liver transplants. After risk adjustment, the likelihood of receiving an LDLT rose by 73% in recent years (aOR 1.73 for 2014-2019 vs. 2002-2007) but remained lower for older adults, men, racial and ethnic minorities, and obese patients. LDLT was less commonly used in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma or alcoholic cirrhosis, and more frequently in those with hepatitis C and with lower severity of illness (Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score < 15). Patients with public insurance, lower educational achievement, and residence in the Northwest and Southeast had decreased access. While some differences in access to LDLT reflect clinical factors, further exploration into disparities in LDLT utilization based on center practice and socioeconomic determinants of health is needed.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Trasplante de Hígado / Enfermedad Hepática en Estado Terminal / Neoplasias Hepáticas Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Humans / Male País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Clin Transplant Asunto de la revista: TRANSPLANTE Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Trasplante de Hígado / Enfermedad Hepática en Estado Terminal / Neoplasias Hepáticas Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Humans / Male País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Clin Transplant Asunto de la revista: TRANSPLANTE Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos