Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Gaps and challenges in nonclinical assessments of pharmaceuticals: An FDA/CDER perspective on considerations for development of new approach methodologies.
Avila, Amy M; Bebenek, Ilona; Mendrick, Donna L; Peretz, Jackye; Yao, Jia; Brown, Paul C.
Afiliación
  • Avila AM; Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave, Silver Spring, MD, 20993, United States.
  • Bebenek I; Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave, Silver Spring, MD, 20993, United States.
  • Mendrick DL; National Center for Toxicological Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave, Silver Spring, MD, 20993, United States.
  • Peretz J; Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave, Silver Spring, MD, 20993, United States.
  • Yao J; Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave, Silver Spring, MD, 20993, United States.
  • Brown PC; Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave, Silver Spring, MD, 20993, United States. Electronic address: Paul.Brown@fda.hhs.gov.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol ; 139: 105345, 2023 Mar.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36746323
Previously, we provided an FDA/CDER perspective on nonclinical testing strategies and briefly discussed the opportunities and challenges of using new approach methodologies (NAMs) in drug development, especially for regulatory purposes. To facilitate the integration of NAMs into nonclinical regulatory testing, we surveyed the CDER Pharmacology/Toxicology community to identify the nonclinical challenges faced by CDER review staff, including gaps and areas of concern underserved by current nonclinical testing approaches, and to understand how development of NAMs with specific contexts of use (COUs) could potentially alleviate them. Survey outcomes were coalesced into CDER-identified needs for which NAMs with specific COUs could potentially be developed to address gaps and challenges in nonclinical safety assessments. We also discussed the current FDA procedure for validation and qualification of NAMs intended to inform regulatory decisions. This manuscript is intended to facilitate productive discussions and collaborations with regulatory, government, and academic stakeholders within the drug development community regarding the development and regulatory use of NAMs and their role in safety and efficacy assessment of pharmaceuticals.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Desarrollo de Medicamentos Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Regul Toxicol Pharmacol Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Desarrollo de Medicamentos Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Regul Toxicol Pharmacol Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos