Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Developmental and acquired brain injury have opposite effects on finger coordination in children.
Mimouni-Bloch, Aviva; Shaklai, Sharon; Levin, Moran; Ingber, Moria; Karolitsky, Tanya; Grunbaum, Sigal; Friedman, Jason.
Afiliación
  • Mimouni-Bloch A; Pediatric Neurology and Development Unit, Loewenstein Rehabilitation Medical Center, Ra'anana, Israel.
  • Shaklai S; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel.
  • Levin M; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel.
  • Ingber M; Department of Child and Youth Rehabilitation, Loewenstein Rehabilitation Medical Center, Ra'anana, Israel.
  • Karolitsky T; Department Physical Therapy, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Professions, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel.
  • Grunbaum S; Department of Child and Youth Rehabilitation, Loewenstein Rehabilitation Medical Center, Ra'anana, Israel.
  • Friedman J; Department of Child and Youth Rehabilitation, Loewenstein Rehabilitation Medical Center, Ra'anana, Israel.
Front Hum Neurosci ; 17: 1083304, 2023.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36755895
The ability to coordinate finger forces to dexterously perform tasks develops in children as they grow older. Following brain injury, either developmental (as in cerebral palsy-CP) or acquired (as in traumatic brain injury-TBI), this developmental trajectory will likely be impaired. In this study, we compared finger coordination in a group of children aged 4-12 with CP and TBI to a group of typically developing children using an isometric pressing task. As expected, deficits were observed in functional tests (Jebsen Taylor test of hand function, Box and Block test) for both groups, and children in both groups performed the pressing task less well than the control group. However, differing results were observed between the CP and TBI groups when using the uncontrolled manifold hypothesis to look at the synergy index. This index measures the relative amount of "good" (does not affect the outcome measure) and "bad" (does affect the outcome measure) variability, where in this case the outcome measure is the total force produced by the fingers. While children with CP were more variable in their performance, their synergy index was not significantly different from typically developing children, suggesting the development of compensatory strategies. In contrast, the children following TBI showed performance that got worse as a function of age (i.e., the older children with TBI performed worse than the younger children with TBI). These differences between the groups may be a result of different areas of brain injury typically observed in CP and TBI, and the different amount of time that has passed since the injury.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Front Hum Neurosci Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Israel

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Front Hum Neurosci Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Israel