Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Research Infrastructure Contact Zones: a framework and dataset to characterise the activities of major biodiversity informatics initiatives.
Smith, Vincent Stuart; French, Lisa; Vincent, Sarah; Woodburn, Matt; Addink, Wouter; Arvanitidis, Christos; Bánki, Olaf; Casino, Ana; Dusoulier, Francois; Glöckler, Falko; Hobern, Donald; Kalfatovic, Martin R; Koureas, Dimitrios; Mergen, Patricia; Miller, Joe; Schulman, Leif; Juslén, Aino.
Afiliación
  • Smith VS; Natural History Museum, London, United Kingdom Natural History Museum London United Kingdom.
  • French L; Natural History Museum, London, United Kingdom Natural History Museum London United Kingdom.
  • Vincent S; Natural History Museum, London, United Kingdom Natural History Museum London United Kingdom.
  • Woodburn M; Natural History Museum, London, United Kingdom Natural History Museum London United Kingdom.
  • Addink W; Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Leiden, Netherlands Naturalis Biodiversity Center Leiden Netherlands.
  • Arvanitidis C; Distributed System of Scientific Collections - DiSSCo, Leiden, Netherlands Distributed System of Scientific Collections - DiSSCo Leiden Netherlands.
  • Bánki O; LifeWatch ERIC, Seville, Spain LifeWatch ERIC Seville Spain.
  • Casino A; Institute of Marine Biology, Biotechnology and Aquaculture, Heraklion, Crete, Greece Institute of Marine Biology, Biotechnology and Aquaculture Heraklion, Crete Greece.
  • Dusoulier F; Catalogue of Life, Amsterdam, Netherlands Catalogue of Life Amsterdam Netherlands.
  • Glöckler F; Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Leiden, Netherlands Naturalis Biodiversity Center Leiden Netherlands.
  • Hobern D; Consortium of European Taxonomic Facilities, Brussels, Belgium Consortium of European Taxonomic Facilities Brussels Belgium.
  • Kalfatovic MR; Muséum national d'histoire naturelle, Paris, France Muséum national d'histoire naturelle Paris France.
  • Koureas D; Museum für Naturkunde Berlin, Leibniz Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity Science, Berlin, Germany Museum für Naturkunde Berlin, Leibniz Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity Science Berlin Germany.
  • Mergen P; International Barcode of Life, Guelph, Canada International Barcode of Life Guelph Canada.
  • Miller J; Smithsonian Institution Libraries and Archives / Biodiversity Heritage Library, Washington, United States of America Smithsonian Institution Libraries and Archives / Biodiversity Heritage Library Washington United States of America.
  • Schulman L; Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Leiden, Netherlands Naturalis Biodiversity Center Leiden Netherlands.
  • Juslén A; Distributed System of Scientific Collections - DiSSCo, Leiden, Netherlands Distributed System of Scientific Collections - DiSSCo Leiden Netherlands.
Biodivers Data J ; 10: e82953, 2022.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36761622
ABSTRACT

Background:

The landscape of biodiversity data infrastructures and organisations is complex and fragmented. Many occupy specialised niches representing narrow segments of the multidimensional biodiversity informatics space, while others operate across a broad front, but differ from others by data type(s) handled, their geographic scope and the life cycle phase(s) of the data they support. In an effort to characterise the various dimensions of the biodiversity informatics landscape, we developed a framework and dataset to survey these dimensions for ten organisations (DiSSCo, GBIF, iBOL, Catalogue of Life, iNaturalist, Biodiversity Heritage Library, GeoCASe, LifeWatch, eLTER ELIXIR), relative to both their current activities and long-term strategic ambitions. New information The survey assessed the contact between the infrastructure organisations by capturing the breadth of activities for each infrastructure across five categories (data, standards, software, hardware and policy), for nine types of data (specimens, collection descriptions, opportunistic observations, systematic observations, taxonomies, traits, geological data, molecular data and literature) and for seven phases of activity (creation, aggregation, access, annotation, interlinkage, analysis and synthesis). This generated a dataset of 6,300 verified observations, which have been scored and validated by leading members of each infrastructure organisation. The resulting data allow high-level questions about the overall biodiversity informatics landscape to be addressed, including the greatest gaps and contact between organisations.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Biodivers Data J Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Biodivers Data J Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article