Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Free-style technique versus computed tomographic angiography-guided perforator selection in deep inferior epigastric perforator flap harvest: A prospective clinical study.
Santanelli di Pompeo, Fabio; Paolini, Guido; D'Orsi, Gennaro; Atzeni, Matteo; Catalano, Carlo; Cannavale, Giuseppe; Cilia, Francesco; Firmani, Guido; Sorotos, Michail.
Afiliación
  • Santanelli di Pompeo F; Department of Plastic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome - Sant'Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy.
  • Paolini G; Department of Plastic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome - Sant'Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy.
  • D'Orsi G; Department of Plastic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome - Sant'Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy.
  • Atzeni M; Department of Plastic Surgery and Microsurgery, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
  • Catalano C; Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
  • Cannavale G; Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
  • Cilia F; Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
  • Firmani G; Department of Plastic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome - Sant'Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy.
  • Sorotos M; Department of Plastic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome - Sant'Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Microsurgery ; 43(8): 790-799, 2023 Nov.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36847143
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Computed tomographic angiography (CTA) is the preferred diagnostic tool in preoperative deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap assessment, though some surgeons prefer approaching perforator selection with intraoperative findings alone.

METHODS:

This prospective observational study conducted between 2015 and 2020 assessed our intraoperative decision-making "free-style" technique for DIEP flap harvest. Any patient with indication for immediate or delayed breast reconstruction using abdominally based flaps and who received preoperative CTA was enrolled. Only unilateral cases performed by the same surgeon were considered. Allergy to iodine-based contrast media, renal impairment and claustrophobia were other exclusion criteria. Primary endpoint consisted in comparing operative times and complication rates between free-style technique and CTA-guided approach. Secondary endpoints included evaluation of agreement rate between intraoperative findings and CTA, and identification of variables affecting operative time and complication rate. Demographics, surgical information, agreement versus non-agreement and complications were collected.

RESULTS:

Starting from 206 patients, 100 were enrolled. Fifty were assigned to Group A, receiving DIEP flap with free-style technique. The other 50 were assigned to Group B, receiving DIEP flap with CTA-guided perforators selection. Study groups' demographics were homogenous. Operative time was statistically lower (p = .036) in free-style group (252.4 ± 44.77 min vs. 265.6 ± 31.67 min). Complication rates were higher in CTA-guided group (10% vs. 2%) though this was not significant (p = .092). Overall agreement rate in dominant perforator selection between intraoperatively and CTA-based assessment was 81%. Multiple regression analysis showed no variable increased complication rate, though CTA-guided approach, BMI > 30 and harvesting more than one perforator were respectively associated with B-coefficient of 17.391 (2.430-32.351, 95% CI) [p = .023], 3.50 (0.640-6.379, 95% CI) [p = .017] and 18.887 (6.232-31.542, 95% CI) [p = .004], predicting increased operative time.

CONCLUSIONS:

The free-style technique proved to be a useful tool for guiding DIEP flap harvest with good sensibility in detecting the dominant perforator suggested by CTA without statistically increasing surgery duration and complications.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Mamoplastia / Colgajo Perforante Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Microsurgery Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Italia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Mamoplastia / Colgajo Perforante Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Microsurgery Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Italia