Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Regional practice variation in pelvic organ prolapse surgery in Tuscany, Italy: a retrospective cohort study on administrative health data.
Ferrari, Amerigo; Giannini, Andrea; Seghieri, Chiara; Simoncini, Tommaso; Vainieri, Milena.
Afiliación
  • Ferrari A; Institute of Management, MeS (Management and Health) Laboratory, Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy amerigo.ferrari@santannapisa.it.
  • Giannini A; Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
  • Seghieri C; Institute of Management, MeS (Management and Health) Laboratory, Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
  • Simoncini T; Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
  • Vainieri M; Institute of Management, MeS (Management and Health) Laboratory, Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
BMJ Open ; 13(3): e068145, 2023 03 07.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36882257
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To explore determinants of practice variation in both access, and quality and efficiency of surgical care for pelvic organ prolapse (POP). DESIGN AND

SETTING:

A retrospective cohort study employing administrative health data from the Tuscany region, Italy.

PARTICIPANTS:

All women over 40 years hospitalised for apical/multicompartmental POP reconstructive surgery (excluding anterior/posterior colporrhaphy without concomitant hysterectomy) from January 2017 to December 2019.

OUTCOMES:

We first computed treatment rates just for women residing in Tuscany (n=2819) and calculated the Systematic Component of Variation (SCV) to explore variation in access to care among health districts. Then, using the full cohort (n=2959), we ran multilevel models for the average length of stay and reoperations, readmissions and complications, and computed the intraclass correlation coefficient to assess the individual and hospital determinants of efficiency and quality of care provided by hospitals.

RESULTS:

The 5.4-fold variation between the lowest-rate (56/100 000 inhabitants) and the highest-rate (302/100 000) districts and the SCV over 10% confirmed high systematic variation in the access to care. Higher treatment rates were driven by greater provisions of robotic and/or laparoscopic interventions, which showed highly variable usage rates. Both individual and hospital factors influenced quality and efficiency provided by hospitals, but just low proportions of variation were explained by hospital and patient characteristics.

CONCLUSIONS:

We found high and systematic variation in the access to POP surgical care in Tuscany and in quality and efficiency provided by hospitals. Such a variation may be mainly explained by user and provider preferences, which should be further explored. Also, supply-side factors may be involved, suggesting that wider and more uniform dissemination of robotic/laparoscopic procedures may reduce variation.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico / Hospitales Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Female / Humans País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Italia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico / Hospitales Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Female / Humans País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Italia