Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Multi-Institutional Study of Pathologist Reading of the Programmed Cell Death Ligand-1 Combined Positive Score Immunohistochemistry Assay for Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer.
Fernandez, Aileen I; Robbins, Charles J; Gaule, Patricia; Agostini-Vulaj, Diana; Anders, Robert A; Bellizzi, Andrew M; Chen, Wei; Chen, Zongming Eric; Gopal, Purva; Zhao, Lei; Lisovsky, Mikhail; Liu, Xiuli; Shia, Jinru; Wang, Huamin; Yang, Zhaohai; McCann, Leena; Chan, Yvonne G; Weidler, Jodi; Bates, Michael; Zhang, Xuchen; Rimm, David L.
Afiliación
  • Fernandez AI; Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
  • Robbins CJ; Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
  • Gaule P; Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
  • Agostini-Vulaj D; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York.
  • Anders RA; Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
  • Bellizzi AM; Department of Pathology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.
  • Chen W; Department of Pathology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio.
  • Chen ZE; Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
  • Gopal P; Department of Pathology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
  • Zhao L; Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Lisovsky M; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire.
  • Liu X; Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri.
  • Shia J; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
  • Wang H; Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
  • Yang Z; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • McCann L; Oncology Research and Development, Cepheid, Sunnyvale, California.
  • Chan YG; Oncology Research and Development, Cepheid, Sunnyvale, California.
  • Weidler J; Medical and Scientific Affairs and Strategy, Oncology, Cepheid, Sunnyvale, California.
  • Bates M; Medical and Scientific Affairs and Strategy, Oncology, Cepheid, Sunnyvale, California.
  • Zhang X; Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
  • Rimm DL; Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; Department of Internal Medicine (Medical Oncology), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut. Electronic address: david.rimm@yale.edu.
Mod Pathol ; 36(5): 100128, 2023 05.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36889057
ABSTRACT
The assessment of the expression of programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) using immunohistochemistry (IHC) has been controversial since its introduction. The methods of assessment and the range of assays and platforms contribute to confusion. Perhaps the most challenging aspect of PD-L1 IHC is the combined positive score (CPS) method of interpretation of IHC results. Although the CPS method is prescribed for more indications than any other PD-L1 scoring system, its reproducibility has never been rigorously assessed. In this study, we collected a series of 108 gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer cases, stained them using the Food and Drug Administration-approved 22C3 assay, scanned them, and then circulated them to 14 pathologists at 13 institutions for the assessment of interpretative concordance for the CPS system. We found that higher cut points (10 or 20) performed better than a CPS of <1 or >1. We used the Observers Needed to Evaluate Subjective Tests algorithm to assess how the CPS system might perform in the real-world setting and found that the cut points of <1 or >1 showed an overall percent agreement of only 30% among the pathologist raters, with a plateau occurring at 8 raters. The raters performed better at higher cut points. However, the best cut point of <20 versus that of >20 was still disappointing, with a plateau at an overall percent agreement of 70% (at 7 raters). Although there is no ground truth for CPS, we compared the score with quantitative messenger RNA measurement and showed no relationship between the score (at any cut point) and messenger RNA amount. In summary, we showed that CPS shows high subjective variability among pathologist readers and is likely to perform poorly in the real-world setting. This system may be the root cause of the poor specificity and relatively low predictive value of IHC companion diagnostic tests for PD-1 axis therapies that use the CPS system.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Gástricas / Neoplasias Esofágicas Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Mod Pathol Asunto de la revista: PATOLOGIA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Gástricas / Neoplasias Esofágicas Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Mod Pathol Asunto de la revista: PATOLOGIA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article